In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth is Revolutionary.
Wednesday, April 24, 2024

Presidential race dead even

U.S. Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton holds a news conference on the airport tarmac in front of her campaign plane in White Plains, New York, United States September 8, 2016. REUTERS/Brian Snyder
Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton holds a news conference on the airport tarmac in front of her campaign plane in White Plains, New York. REUTERS/Brian Snyder

An election analysis conducted in the Reuters/Ipsos States of the Nation project shows that the race has tightened considerably over the past few weeks, with Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump projected to win Florida, an essential battleground state, if the election were held today.

The project, which is based on a weekly tracking poll of more than 15,000 Americans, shows that the 2016 presidential race could end in a photo finish on Nov. 8, with the major-party candidates running nearly even in the Electoral College, the body that ultimately selects the president.

The States of the Nation project, which delivers a weekly tally of support for the candidates in every state, shows that the race has tightened in several traditional battlegrounds. Pennsylvania has been moved from a likely win for Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton to a tossup; Ohio has been moved from a tossup to a likely win for Clinton. And Florida is now considered a likely win for the Republican nominee, with 50 percent support for Trump to 46 percent support for Clinton.

If the election were held today, the project estimates that Clinton has a 60 percent chance of winning by 18 electoral votes. Last week, the project estimated that Clinton had a 83 percent chance of winning the election.

In a separate national Reuters/Ipsos tracking poll, Clinton continues to lead Trump by 4 percentage points, and her recent bout with pneumonia doesn’t appear to have scared away her supporters.

The national Sept. 9-15 tracking poll showed that 42 percent of likely voters supported Clinton while 38 percent backed Trump. Clinton, who has mostly led Trump in the poll since the Democratic and Republican national conventions ended in July, regained the advantage this week after her lead briefly faded in late August.

Clinton has an advantage among minorities, women, people who make more than $75,000 a year, and those with moderate political leanings. Trump has an advantage with whites, men, avid churchgoers, and people who are nearing retirement age.


Overall, Americans appear to be relatively uninspired by their choices for president with less than eight weeks to go before the election. One out of every five likely voters said they do not support Clinton or Trump for president. In comparison, about one out of every 10 likely voters wouldn’t support Obama or Republican challenger Mitt Romney at a similar point in the 2012 presidential campaign.

Respondents took the survey after video surfaced of Clinton nearly collapsing at a Sept. 11 memorial in New York on Sunday. Her campaign later said she had a non-contagious, bacterial form of pneumonia.

The video sparked a renewed discussion about the health of both candidates. Trump, 70, would be the oldest president to take office, while Clinton, 68, would be the second oldest.

Clinton and Trump candidates have since released details of their personal health. Clinton’s doctors said her physical exam was normal, apart from the pneumonia, and that she was in excellent mental condition. Trump released a note from his doctor saying that he was in “excellent physical health.”

Americans do not appear to be overly concerned with the health of either candidate. According to a separate question in the poll conducted this week, most American adults said the issue would make “no difference” to how they voted.

A negligible percentage of Clinton supporters said concerns about her health made them “less likely” to vote for her.

Clinton led all candidates in a four-way poll of likely voters that included Gary Johnson of the Libertarian Party and Jill Stein of the Green Party. Seven percent of respondents supported Johnson, and 2 percent backed Stein.

The Reuters/Ipsos poll is conducted online in English in all 50 states. The latest horserace poll surveyed 1,579 likely voters over the past week. The question on the candidates’ health surveyed 1,179 American adults from Sept. 12-16. Both polls had a credibility interval, a measure of accuracy, of 3 percentage points.

National polls have produced varying measurements of support during the 2016 campaign for Clinton and Trump. The differences are partly due to the fact that some polls, like Reuters/Ipsos, try to include only likely voters, while others include all registered voters. The Reuters/Ipsos tracking poll gathers responses every day and reports results twice a week, so it often detects trends in sentiment before most other polls.

Polling aggregators, which calculate averages of major polls, have shown that Clinton’s lead over Trump has been shrinking this month. The most recent individual polls put Clinton’s advantage at 1 or 2 percentage points.


Copyright © 2016 Capitol Hill Blue

Copyright  © 2016 Thomson Reuters. All Rights Reserved

2 thoughts on “Presidential race dead even”

  1. I recall being reliably told in several articles and opinion pieces on this website that Trump was in a hopeless situation and would inevitably lose the election. Now we find out that isn’t true at all. What went wrong with the analysis? I have some ideas but is anyone working on a piece to explain?

    “Americans do not appear to be overly concerned with the health of either candidate. According to a separate question in the poll conducted this week, most American adults said the issue would make “no difference” to how they voted.”

    Let me provide an example with the above statement. Most Americans are not going to be willing to admit that they would be shallow and refuse to vote for someone who is sick. Especially grandma. When our grandma gets very sick we feel sorry for her and worry about her, so the last thing we are going to admit is that we might abandon her and vote for someone else.

    But then we have that whole nuclear codes argument that people were trotting out when Trump was saying crazy things and people (with no background in psychology/psychiatry) were claiming he was psycho. Some people are going to feel uneasy turning over the nuclear codes to someone who may be incapacitated. No one will know when they actually step into the voting booth what they might decide to do.

    It reminds me of a young man I read about who could never get a second date with any woman he went out with. In all categories women normally look for, he was reasonably if not spectacularly blessed, including height, weight, looks, smarts, confidence level. So what was the problem? The problem is that he was completely blind…seeing eye dog, walking stick, braille. Not one of those women were willing to admit they were eliminating him from romantic consideration because he was blind, but that was, of course, exactly why they wouldn’t see him anymore. They felt sorry for him, and for a woman, pity kills attraction.

    As an afterthought, maybe we should have a discussion about getting rid of nuclear codes after this election. That doesn’t mean having to get rid of nuclear weapons. As far as I know, Putin doesn’t have to carry nuclear codes. The Russians put their nukes on trains and keep them moving, which means they aren’t sitting ducks for a first strike. It may actually be cheaper than maintaining stationary missile silos.

  2. Not surprised the race has tightened since it’s in the $$ interest of the media that it becomes a horse race. You can’t squeeze huge amounts of political advertising out of either campaign if there’s a 10 pt. lead happening for one of them.

Comments are closed.