In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth is Revolutionary.
Thursday, December 7, 2023

So much for diplomacy or bipartisanship

President Barack Obama. (AP Photo/J. David Ake)
President Barack Obama. (AP Photo/J. David Ake)

Diplomacy is out, blunt talk is in as President Barack Obama and his White House team single out Republican lawmakers by name for criticism over their words and actions on Iran, Cabinet nominations and climate change.

Even amid glimmers of bipartisanship in Washington, the White House approach amounts to this: when you can’t join ’em, beat ’em.

In the past week, the president and his spokesman have targeted Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and GOP Sens. John McCain of Arizona and Charles Grassley of Iowa for their words and actions on the Iran nuclear deal and the delayed confirmation of attorney general nominee Loretta Lynch.

“Enough. Enough!” Obama declared Friday, delivering a testy lecture to Senate Republicans over the long wait Lynch has faced since he nominated her in early November. “This is embarrassing, a process like this.”

This is a White House unleashed, dispensing with niceties for the kind of blunt talk some of Obama’s allies have been demanding for some time. A president who once ran on the promise of changing the tone in the capital now seems to have fully embraced its political combat.

Last Saturday, Obama hit McCain hard. The 2008 GOP presidential nominee had declared a major setback in the Iran talks after Iran’s supreme leader demanded that sanctions against Tehran had to be lifted immediately after a deal went into place.

The preliminary deal says the sanctions will be lifted as Iran proves it is complying with limits on its nuclear program.

Obama cast McCain’s criticism as an assault on the credibility of Secretary of State John Kerry.

“That’s an indication of the degree to which partisanship has crossed all boundaries,” Obama said. “That’s a problem. It needs to stop.”

He went on: “We have Mitch McConnell trying to tell the world, oh, don’t have confidence in the U.S. government’s abilities to fulfill any climate change pledge that we might make.”

On Thursday, White House spokesman Josh Earnest singled out Grassley, noting that Grassley had once urged Obama not to push through Lynch during the lame duck Senate in November and December but now said Democrats should have acted on her when they had a Senate majority. Earnest called Grassley’s stance “duplicitous.”

Asked how harsh words might help his cause, Earnest replied: “Being nice has gotten us a 160-day delay. So maybe after they look up ‘duplicitous’ in the dictionary we’ll get a different result.”

It was the kind of “ouch” moment seldom heard from the White House.

Republicans have their own eye-rolling response.

“We’re used it,” said McConnell, whose frequently jousts with Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada. “We used to get it from the Democratic leader routinely.”

Still, Pat Griffin, who was legislative director in the Clinton administration, said the tone from the White House dovetails with the aggressive strategy Obama has set since his party lost control of the Senate in November and put Congress in Republican hands.

“I think the president since the election has kept these guys on their heels,” Griffin said. Obama and his aides “have come to understand that you don’t get the attention of these guys and the attention of the country without having some edge.”

Republicans maintain Obama would be better off working on bipartisan efforts, such as trade. Top lawmakers on Thursday revealed a bipartisan agreement to give Obama authority to negotiate trade deals without having to face delays in Congress. But many Democrats oppose such deals, fearing they will cost jobs or lower environmental standards.

“Rather than spending so much time criticizing people like Chuck Grassley and myself, he ought to be out there lining up the Democratic votes for trade promotion authority,” McConnell said in an interview Friday. “This is a time for presidential leadership.”

As for Lynch, McConnell said, “The cheap shots at Sen. Grassley were particularly inappropriate.”

Lynch’s confirmation has been delayed because McConnell has wanted to pass a sexual trafficking bill through the Senate first. That bill has been held up because of Democratic objections to anti-abortion language in the bill. McConnell predicted the dispute would be resolved next week, opening the way for a vote on Lynch.

For many Democratic allies of the White House, Obama’s confrontational talk could have come even sooner.

“If you’re sitting at the White House looking at Republicans on Capitol Hill, especially on the House side, you can’t expect either much respect from them or a willingness to get much done,” said Jim Manley, a Democratic strategist and former top aide to Reid. “Point two, as we move into the primary season, the base is looking for a more combative tone from the White House as well.”

The last two years of a second term are especially liberating for presidents. They don’t face re-election and they don’t feel they have much to lose legislatively by going on the offensive.

“It feels good to do that when you have been bottled up,” said Matt Bennett, a veteran of the Clinton White House.


Reach Jim Kuhnhenn at

Copyright © 2015 Capitol Hill Blue

Copyright  © 2015 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved

2 thoughts on “So much for diplomacy or bipartisanship”

  1. The President of the United States calling senators’ actions “crazy”. I don’t believe that anyone who is older than twenty ever thought they’d see the day when the President would use such language, but it’s become so commonplace over the past six years that we’ve grown used to it. It’s a shame. And the type of rhetoric he uses has degraded our civility towards each other. It would be easy to say, “Well, they were first”, or “They deserve it”, but the President is supposed to be the calming, unifying figure of the country. This one chose to demean, vilify and ridicule anyone who disagreed with him front he outset of his term, and from that time we have been going steadily down hill. Everyone hates everyone else, there is no tolerance for any different points of view and, in general, we are becoming the western version of Shiites and Sunnis.

Comments are closed.