In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth is Revolutionary.
Monday, March 4, 2024

General reduced two grades for sexual misconduct

Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair    (AP Photo/Ted Richardson)
Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Sinclair
(AP Photo/Ted Richardson)

The Army is reducing the rank of a brigadier general at the center of a sexual misconduct case by two grades for his pending retirement, in a rare move that will slash his benefits and force him to retire as a lieutenant colonel.

Army Secretary John McHugh announced the decision Friday, saying that Brig. Gen. Jeffrey A. Sinclair “displayed a pattern of inappropriate and at times illegal behavior both while serving as a brigadier general and a colonel.”

Sinclair is due to retire in late summer.

McHugh’s move comes three months after Sinclair pleaded guilty at a court martial to adultery and conducting inappropriate relationships with two other women. Over the past year, his case has been a central topic in Congress in the debate over whether the military has adequately handled sexual assault cases.

Rep. Jackie Speier, D-Calif., a member of the Armed Services Committee and one of the key voices in the House pushing for stronger action on sexual assault in the military, said Friday that McHugh’s action was inadequate.

“This punishment is in no way proportional to the laundry list of serious offenses Sinclair pled guilty to,” Speier said. “The final outcome of this case can only be seen as further evidence that the military justice system is broken and that the chain of command cannot adequately address the gravity of these offenses.”

Sinclair had a three-year affair with a female captain who accused him of twice forcing her to perform oral sex on him. The former deputy commander of the 82nd Airborne Division was originally brought up on sexual assault charges punishable by life in prison. Sinclair was spared prison but fined $20,000 and issued a reprimand.

He was believed to be the highest-ranking U.S. military officer ever court-martialed on such charges. And, the Army said this is the first time in a decade that the service has reduced a retiring general officer by two ranks.

“Gen. Sinclair has consistently taken responsibility for his mistakes and agreed to a reduction in retirement benefits,” his lawyer, Richard Scheff, said in an emailed statement. “He is a highly decorated war hero who made great sacrifices for his country, and it’s right that he be permitted to retire honorably.”

While retirement benefits are mandated by federal law, there is a requirement that an individual must have served satisfactorily in rank before receiving those benefits, McHugh said in a statement. McHugh determined that Sinclair’s actions as both a one-star general and colonel provided enough evidence to reduce his rank in retirement by two grades.

McHugh added that he was prevented by federal law from taking any further action against Sinclair, so he did what was “legally sustainable.”

The Army was unable Friday immediately to provide any estimates of how much retirement pay Sinclair might be losing as a result of McHugh’s decision.

Sinclair was convicted at a court-martial in March 2014. But his sentence of a reprimand and fine triggered outrage in Congress, as members questioned whether the Uniform Code of Military Justice should be overhauled.

“This is a sexual predator,” Speier, the California Democrat, told McHugh during a March hearing on Capitol Hill. “For a sexual predator to gain this rank and given a slap on the wrist suggests that the system doesn’t work.”

The case fueled anger about the increasing number of sexual assaults in the military and raised persistent questions about whether victims feel free to report the assaults to their commanders.

The Pentagon narrowly beat back congressional efforts to strip commanders of the authority to prosecute cases, especially those related to sexual assault, and hand the job to seasoned military lawyers.


Associated Press writer Michael Biesecker contributed to this report from Raleigh, N.C.


Copyright  © 2013 Capitol Hill Blue

Copyright  © 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved

2 thoughts on “General reduced two grades for sexual misconduct”

  1. Thank the gods that the U.S. military still has some standards concerning such unethical behavior. This guy got his just desserts. : |

    The greatest risk to this type of behavior is compromise of command and control of your men and the mission.

    Once an officer becomes a “loose cannon on deck” then he’s a liability to the mission; I.E., protecting the interests of the United States of America and its citizens regardless of how seemingly trivial by our now ‘anything goes’ modern era paradigm.

    Carl Nemo **==

Comments are closed.