In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth is Revolutionary.
Monday, July 15, 2024

Senate Dems kill GOP climate change ban


Senate Democrats on Wednesday defeated a Republican effort to ban the Environmental Protection Agency from controlling the gases blamed for global warming, as House Republicans prepared to pass a bill to block the agency from reducing climate-altering pollution.

In a 50-50 vote, the Senate rejected a measure by Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky and Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma that would have repealed a 2009 finding by federal scientists that climate change caused by greenhouse gases endangers human health and would have prevented the agency from using existing law to regulate heat-trapping pollution. The amendment — to a small-business bill — needed 60 votes to pass.

Only four Democrats — Sens. Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Joe Manchin of West Virginia, Mark Pryor of Arkansas and Ben Nelson of Nebraska — supported the McConnell bid. One Republican, Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, voted against it.

Meanwhile, the Republican-controlled House was expected to vote on an identical bill Thursday. The White House has threatened to veto it. The House voted earlier this year to prohibit the EPA from spending any money to regulate greenhouse gases as part of a spending bill for the next six months. It is part of negotiations among the White House, Senate Democrats and House Republicans to keep the government running.

Senate Democrats proposed Wednesday less aggressive prohibitions on the EPA that would have delayed regulations for two years, exempted certain industries, or both. But the most votes any of the three alternatives received was 12. Republicans nearly unanimously voted against them, and so did most Democrats.

In a statement Wednesday night, White House press secretary Jay Carney said the administration was “encouraged” by the Senate’s actions to defend the EPA “by rejecting efforts to roll back EPA’s common-sense steps to safeguard Americans from harmful pollution.”

“The fact is, why should we play doctor? I’m too humble to repeal science,” said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., taking the position of many Democrats against the McConnell amendment’s overturning of a finding by the EPA that greenhouse gases endanger human health and welfare. EPA scientists had made the same conclusion under President George W. Bush, but the White House never acted on the recommendation.

Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., said that while “it was tempting to think a two-year delay is middle ground … in protecting public health it is two years too long.”

Republicans, in hours of debate Wednesday, painted EPA’s regulations as an overreach of government that will harm the economy and lead to job losses and must be stopped. They stressed that their efforts to hamstring the agency in the case of global warming would not affect other parts of the Clean Air Act that protect people from toxic and lung-damaging pollutants.

“This legislation will remove the biggest regulatory threat to the American economy,” said Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., the chairman of House Energy and Commerce Committee and chief sponsor of the House bill. “This is a threat imposed not by Congress, but entirely by the Obama Environmental Protection Agency.”

Senate Republicans argued the lesser measures protected a handful of Democrats who could be vulnerable in 2012 elections, but would do little to protect American jobs and electricity costs in the long run. They also pointed out, as the EPA has acknowledged, that controlling greenhouse gases in the United States would do little to reduce the temperature of the planet, since other countries are not addressing the problem.

“Democrats themselves recognize the dangers of these EPA regulations,” McConnell said Wednesday. “Yet instead of voting for the one amendment that solves the problem, they’re hiding behind sham amendments designed to give them political cover.”

Copyright © 2011 The Associated Press

2 thoughts on “Senate Dems kill GOP climate change ban”

  1. Iodine, get yo iodine.
    Yo, iodine,
    fresh from the mine,

    This message brought to you by Plausible Denial,
    a subsidiary of your local FEMA pharmacy’s office.

  2. This same EPA claimed it was safe to breathe at ground zero after 9/11. This same EPA claims increased radioactive particles aren’t a threat to human health after Fukushima, and so they raised the “safe limit” to meet what was being detected in milk and drinking water in America’s Heartland.

    Meanwhile, doctors say no level of radiation is safe, and scientists aren’t all in agreement over the Anthropomorphic Global Warming Hypothesis. The EPA can’t fine Japan, but they sure can go after carbon dioxide emitters even though their proof is of dubious nature and has signs of inappropriate and incorrect scientific method.

Comments are closed.