In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth is Revolutionary.
Friday, June 14, 2024

House votes to gut domestic spending programs

Congressmen walk down the steps of the House of Representatives as they work overnight on a spending bill, on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Feb. 18, 2011. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

Jolted to action by deficit-conscious newcomers, the Republican-controlled House passed sweeping legislation early Saturday to cut $61 billion from hundreds of federal programs and shelter coal companies, oil refiners and farmers from new government regulations.

The 235-189 vote to send the bill to the Senate was largely along party lines and defied a veto threat from President Barack Obama. It marked the most striking victory to date for the 87-member class of freshmen Republicans elected last fall on a promise to attack the deficit and reduce the reach of government. Three Republicans joined Democrats in opposing the measure.

“The American people have spoken. They demand that Washington stop its out-of-control spending now, not some time in the future,” declared freshman Rep. Tim Huelskamp, R-Kan.

The $1.2 trillion bill covers every Cabinet agency through the Sept. 30 end of the budget year, imposing severe spending cuts aimed at domestic programs and foreign aid, including aid for schools, nutrition programs, environmental protection, and heating and housing subsidies for the poor.

The measure faces a rough ride in the Democratic-controlled Senate, even before the GOP amendments adopted Thursday, Friday and early Saturday morning pushed the bill further and further to the right on health care and environmental policy. Senate Democrats promise higher spending levels and are poised to defend Obama’s health care bill, environmental policies and new efforts to overhaul regulation of the financial services industry.

Changes rammed through the House on Friday and Saturday would shield greenhouse-gas polluters and privately owned colleges from federal regulators, block a plan to clean up the Chesapeake Bay, and bar the government from shutting down mountaintop mines it believes will cause too much water pollution, siding with business groups over environmental activists and federal regulators in almost every instance.

“This is like a Cliff Notes summary of every issue that the Republicans, the Chamber of Commerce, and the (free market) CATO Institute have pushed for 30 years,” said Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass. “And they’re just going to run them through here.”

The gulf between the combatants ensures that difference on the measure won’t be resolved soon, requiring a temporary spending bill when a current stopgap measure expires March 4. Senate Democrats and House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, are already maneuvering for political advantage in anticipation of talks on a short-term extension that will be needed.

Democrats say Boehner’s insistence that any stopgap measure carry spending cuts amounts to an ultimatum that could threaten a government shutdown like the episodes that played to the advantage of former President Bill Clinton in his battles with Republicans in 1995-1996.

The Obama administration upped the ante on Friday, warning that workers who distribute Social Security benefits might be furloughed if the GOP cuts go through.

Across four long days of freewheeling debate, Republicans left their conservative stamp in other ways.

They took several swipes at the year-old health care law, including voting for a ban on federal funding for its implementation. At the behest of anti-abortion lawmakers, they called for an end to federal funding for Planned Parenthood.

Republicans awarded the Pentagon an increase of less than 2 percent increase, but domestic agencies would bear slashing cuts of about 12 percent. Such reductions would feel almost twice as deep since they would be spread over the final seven months of the budget year.

Republicans recoiled, however, from some of the most politically difficult cuts to grants to local police and fire departments, special education and economic development. Amtrak supporters easily repelled an attempt to slash its budget.

About the only victory scored by Obama during the week came on a vote Wednesday to cancel $450 million for a costly alternative engine for the Pentagon’s next-generation F-35 warplane. It was a top priority of Defense Secretary Robert Gates and passed with the votes of many GOP conservatives who opposed the $3 billion program, more than half of the 87 Republican freshmen elected last fall on promises to cut the budget.

Democrats overwhelmingly oppose the measure and Obama has threatened a veto if it reaches his desk, citing sweeping cuts that he says would endanger the economic recovery.

“The bill will destroy 800,000 American jobs,” said House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., citing a study by the left-leaning Economic Policy Institute. “It will increase class sizes and take teachers out of the classrooms … It will jeopardize homeless veterans, make our communities less secure, threaten America’s innovation.”

The Environmental Protection Agency was singled out by Republicans eager to defend business and industry from numerous agency regulations they say threaten job-creation and the economy. The EPA’s budget was slashed by almost one-third, and then its regulatory powers were handcuffed in a series of floor votes.

Proposed federal regulations would be blocked on emission of greenhouse gases, blamed for climate change, and a proposed regulation on mercury emissions from cement kilns would also be stopped. Additionally, the bill also calls for a halt to proposed regulations affecting Internet service providers and privately-owned colleges, victories for the industries that would be affected.

The 359-page bill was shaped beginning to end by the first-term Republicans, many of them elected with tea party backing.

They rejected an initial draft advanced by the leadership and produced by Rep. Hal Rogers, R-Ky., chairman of the Appropriations Committee, saying it did not cut deeply enough.

The revised bill added more reductions, and cut $100 billion from Obama’s request for the current year, the amount Republicans had cited in their campaign-season Pledge to America.

But a tea party-backed amendment to slash $22 billion on top of the $60-billion-plus worth of steep cuts already made by the measure failed on Friday almost 2-1.

The heavily subsidized ethanol industry absorbed a pair of defeats Saturday at the hands of it many critics, including Rep. John Sullivan, R-Ohio, who won a vote to block the EPA from approving boosting the amount of ethanol in most gasoline to 15 percent.

On other regulatory issues, foes of the EPA won a 249-176 vote to block the agency from using its regulatory powers to curb greenhouse gases. EPA has already taken steps to regulate global warming pollution from vehicles and the largest factories and industrial plants and is expected to soon roll out rules that target refineries and power plants.

The move to stop the EPA from regulating greenhouse-gas polluters came from Rep. Ted Poe, R-Texas, who said his congressional district is home to more oil refineries than any other.

“We’re in the midst of a massive economic downturn and the last thing we need to do is shoot ourselves in the foot with unnecessary, expensive new regulations that are on business and industry,” he said.

Republicans also prevailed in more parochial issues, with Rep. Tom McClintock, R-Calif., winning a close vote to block the government from removing hydroelectric dams on the Klamath River, while Robert Goodlatte, R-Va., won a 230-195 vote to block an EPA plan for cleaning up the Chesapeake Bay that would cut pollution from runoff from farms and municipalities throughout the Chesapeake watershed.

And Florida agricultural interests won a vote to block EPA rules issued last year aimed at controlling fertilizer and other pollutants that stoke the spread of algae in the state’s waters.

On Thursday, the House voted to block regulations governing the emission of mercury from cement plants and to stop the Federal Communications Commission from enforcing proposed regulations opposed by Verizon and other large Internet Service Providers.

Copyright © 2011 The Associated Press

Enhanced by Zemanta

3 thoughts on “House votes to gut domestic spending programs”

  1. It’s we the people’s fault.
    Right now, the people are sitting at home watching ESPN. No matter what time of day or night ti is there is a diversionary sporting event on to take the mind of the idiot masses and consume them with other thought.
    That or, some talking head who will blame bipartisanship (another false dichotomy) and get the ignorant bickering amongst themselves like a …..wait for it ……sporting event.

    Intellectually lazy, cowards.
    The people truly get the government they deserve.

  2. Unfortunately their 61 billion gesture has the equivalent impact as that of a mouse fart in a hurricane. They’re going to spend 1,239 billion more than is taken in by tax revenues…!?

    When I hear they’ve pruned 1,000 billion off the budget leaving only 300-500 billion overruns with the the plan to run a balanced budget in the near future then I’ll be impressed. Also they need to relentlessly keep pruning economic crippling government regulations away from businesses and “We the People”.

    It’s a start, but to turn the USS America about from an imminent encounter with the reefs of destruction is going to take some serious budget work.

    They also need to get serious about pulling the plug on the Federal Reserve and kicking the “Counterfeiter in Chief” Ben Bernanke to the curb. The U.S. needs to get back into minting it’s own coinage of value and currency backed by such, interest free to the U.S. taxpayers, while telling the obscenely rich Central bankers worldwide to take a hike and to find an honest way to make a buck, euro or shekel. No payback; ie, default and stick’em bigtime as they so richly deserve.

    Carl Nemo **==

  3. These cuts display not one hint of what direction they will take America. Conservatives have no plan other than to die with all the toys like scurrilous schoolyard bullies.
    The wars drag on with no end in sight, while Wall street will be left to pillage unabated and the corporate polluters will have free reign to poison and rape what is left of our environment..

    This whole charade is rooted in the premise that it is we the people who have failed America. The theme now is that less is more where we are concerned, so tighten your belts and don’t wait at the back door of the kitchen, no scraps will be forthcoming.

    The politicians and their masters are now free to display their contempt for the calloused hands that built this nation while wearing their disdain as if it were a badge of honor. We are told we need to be punished for our extravagant behavior and how much it hurts them to do it, but never the less we are to be driven by the lash if need be back to the days of the robber Barons.
    Lastly they will cue up the Klan because as their stated mission goes the number one objective is to ruin this President before he gets started and take back their Lily White House.

    Will it be Mitch or Orange man who gets to light the cross on the White house lawn ?

Comments are closed.