In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth is Revolutionary.
Saturday, June 3, 2023

The health care soap opera approaches

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
(AFP)

Coming soon to daytime television: America’s long-running civic drama over how to provide better health care to more of its people without breaking the bank.

President Barack Obama summons anxious Democrats and aloof Republicans to a White House summit Thursday — live on C-SPAN and perhaps cable — and gambles that he can save his embattled health care overhaul by the power of persuasion. Adversaries and allies alike were surprised by Obama’s invitation to reason together at an open forum, as risky as it is unusual.

Ahead of the meeting, the White House will post on its Web site a health care plan that brings together major elements of the bills passed by House and Senate Democrats last year. Policy is important, but not as critical as the political skill Obama can apply to an impasse that seems close to hopeless in a pivotal congressional election year.

“It’s a high-stakes situation for him more than anybody else,” said Gerald Shea, the top health care adviser for the AFL-CIO. “If the judgment is either that it’s a political farce, or if it fails to move the ball forward significantly … that would be very damaging to the issue and to him.”

A viewers’ guide to the White House meeting, looking at Obama and his plan, Republicans in Congress and divided Democrats.

Obama:

He has two main goals. One is to show the American people that the Democrats’ health care plan is reasonable, and much of its complexity reflects the sprawling nature of the insurance system. The other is to argue that lockstep Republican opposition is not reasonable and could spoil a historic opportunity on a problem that concerns all Americans.

“I don’t want to see this meeting turn into political theater, with each side simply reciting talking points and trying to score political points,” the president said Saturday in his radio and Internet address. “What’s being tested here is not just our ability to solve this one problem, but our ability to solve any problem.”

Obama’s main audience will be Democrats, who must overcome their divisions — and ease their qualms — to get a final bill. He will also tune his pitch to independents, who soured on the Democratic bills after initially being open to health care changes.

Thursday’s meeting at Blair House — the presidential guest quarters across from the White House — comes nearly a year after Obama launched his drive to remake health care at an earlier summit he infused with a bipartisan spirit.

The plan Obama will put before lawmakers has virtually no Republican support. Like the congressional bills, it’s expected to require most Americans to carry coverage, while providing federal subsidies to help many afford the premiums. It would bar insurance companies from denying coverage to people with medical problems or charging them more. Federal and state regulators would create a competitive insurance marketplace for small businesses and people buying their own coverage. Much of the cost would be covered with Medicare cuts.

Obama will retain the Senate bill’s tax on high-cost insurance plans, while easing its impact to placate labor unions. But he’s expected to move closer to the House bill in other areas, such as providing more generous subsidies for purchasing insurance and addressing the Medicare prescription coverage gap.

He will point out that Republicans have supported major elements of the Democratic bills, such as the insurance mandate, new marketplaces for coverage and putting restrictions on insurers.

___

Republicans

GOP leaders in the House and Senate say they cannot accept the Democratic bills, and they want to start over to shape narrower legislation that cuts costs for small businesses and uses federal dollars to set up special insurance pools for people with medical problems.

Obama doesn’t want to stop there.

Republicans want to place limits on medical malpractice judgments, an approach the Congressional Budget Office says would save money by reducing defensive medicine. Obama has toyed with the idea, saying he agrees that something should be done, but thinks limits on jury awards go too far.

Some Republican leaders have questioned whether there’s any reason to go to the summit, but a boycott would play into Obama’s hands. To complicate matters, Democratic liberals have begun an effort to get a government insurance plan back in the bill, a nonstarter for Republicans.

“If the president’s intention for the health care summit is to finally show that he is ready to listen and work in a bipartisan way to produce incremental reforms that the American people support, he is off to a rocky start,” said Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., the No. 2 Republican in the House. Republicans are not going to embrace a Democratic bill that’s tanking in the polls, he said.

___

The Democrats

Before Republican Scott Brown pulled off a Senate upset in Massachusetts to claim the seat long held by Democrat Edward M. Kennedy, Democrats were within reach of passing a health care remake their party pursued for more than a half-century.

They no longer have the 60 votes needed to overcome Republican delaying tactics in the Senate, but they still control both chambers. Yet passing anything but a very modest bill would likely mean using special budget rules that let Democrats override Republicans in the Senate with a simple majority. Using the budget route — called reconciliation — to resolve differences between the House and Senate bills probably would enrage Republicans.

That means Democrats will have to stick their necks out, and some may lose their seats this fall if they support an all-or-nothing push on health care.

Democrats are looking to Obama to give them the confidence they need to get back on track. He did it once before, with his address to Congress last September, after a summer of town hall meetings at which angry grass-roots activists attacked the Democrats on health care.

Democrats “tried to climb a taller mountain than they thought existed,” said former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, architect of the 1994 Republican election victory that followed the collapse of the Clinton health care plan. “They went on a bigger trip than they prepared for.”

Now it seems they’ll be asked to give it one more try.

–RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR

___

On the Net:

White House: https://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/health-care

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

7 thoughts on “The health care soap opera approaches”

  1. Yep – preview working. Thanks Doug.

    And yeah Carl, that Goldman gang is a den o’ snakes. Paulson is my “favorite” viper. Geithner’s a mere worm.

  2. Thanks Almandine for the GEAB link. What I find interesting is that so many ills concerning the world’s capital markets can be linked to shenanigans sponsored by Goldman Sachs which also happens to be one of the dozen or so stockholders of the Federal Reserve System and has been since its founding in 1913. It seems that Central bankers are engaged in a war of their own with citizens of the world simply being collateral damage.

    Seemingly Goldman was involved with illegal currency swaps with Greece and other EuroUnion aspirant nations which was against the rules concerning membership. So it seems that Greece along with other nations they’ve foolishly accepted into the fold were engaged in cooking their books too now wanting a bailout associated with their national profligacy.

    https://www.moneyandmarkets.com/the-future-of-the-euro-in-question-2-37874

    I thought I’d provide a “Money and Markets” link with a currency trader/expert Bryan Rich’s comments concerning this unfolding debacle and its impact on the Eurozone currency system. This articls is provided by Weiss Research. Other than subscribing to this free newsletter I have no vested interest in the company. I suggest other readers register to receive “Money and Markets” newsletters. They are not only informative, but just might save your financial bacon.

    Since your post, it seems Doug has activated the “Preview” function. : )

    Carl Nemo **==

  3. I don’t care for this inability to edit errant comments. To see my link above, use the whole URL through html, not just the highlighted part.

  4. Thanks Griff for the link concerning Greece and its current debt problems.

    Setting socialism aside, it’s hard to believe, but what pushed the country over the edge was the mind-boggling amount of money they spent on the Athens, Olympics. They went screaming yellow zonkers nuts as if the amount spent was of no concern. Now they’ve paid the price as a function of the downturn in world markets, shipping etc.

    This is an example of a nation as the U.S. and many other countries in the West that do not live by the old saying “waste not, want not”. : |

    Carl Nemo **==

  5. Oh freakin’ boy! I just might turn on my 60 – inch paperweight, provided I can remember where the remote is. I don’t think this is what I anticipated when Obama promised more transparency.

    The next Greece?

  6. People simply no longer trust this President. His PR schtick no longer works. Everyone and I mean just about everyone has had bellyful of his “jive turkey” lies and hollow promises.

    We simply cannot afford their corporatist friendly healthcare program…period!

    To date, he and his retread appointees have done nothing that’s visibly beneficial for “We the People”. Everything he and his party promotes is suspect, dysfunctional or broken.

    They need to sit down and chop 1.2 trillion dollars across the board from all programs asap; ie., defense, social services etc. and demonstrate to those that lend us money that we have a serious interest in running a balanced budget then the U.S. might again regain stature as a fiscally responsible nation of some measure.

    Just as a smart homeowner sends in an extra hundred to couple hundred bucks a month to reduce principal on a mortgage we need to come up with a public debt reduction tax for the 12 plus trillion we owe and to start making an attempt although feeble to reduce this debt over time; ie., anything to demonstrate to those that risk their money in the U.S. T-bond market that they aren’t handing their money over to potential national bankruptees. : |

    Carl Nemo **==

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: