In a Time of Universal Deceit, Telling the Truth is Revolutionary.
Friday, January 27, 2023

Bush is no Gandhi

By HAL BROWN The lead editorial in the New York Times ( A Bleak Assessment on Iraq ) today ends as follows:


The lead editorial in the New York Times ( A Bleak Assessment on Iraq ) today ends as follows:

Mr. Bush needs to get serious about demanding such a change, including enforceable deadlines for overdue steps like eliminating militia supporters from the police, ending vengeful anti-Baathist measures targeting the Sunni middle class, and guaranteeing the fair allocation of oil revenues.

Otherwise, Iraq seems headed over the cliff.

I am reminded of Gandhi’s failed attempt to keep India, a country he led to freedom from Great Britain, from splitting into Pakistan and India. The hatred between the minority Muslim Indians and the majority Hindu Indians was too great for even Gandhi to resolve. Once free from British rule, he did manage to get them to stop killing each other, no mean feat, by a “fast until death”. But to his great dismay, he couldn’t stop the partition of India.

Bush, who takes “credit” for liberating Iraq from Saddam’s dictatorship, is no Gandhi.

Had the Iraqis themselves taken down Saddam, perhaps there would be a slim chance that, with or without their own Gandhi, they could have put their sectarian hatred aside for the good of the country.

Of course, there is no Iraqi Gandhi.

The Americans came in and did all the heavy lifting for them and destroyed much of their country in the process.

Then they became an occupying army, and before long they became the new enemy led by the “liberator president” who proved to be as arrogant and removed from their daily life as Saddam had been.

Like Saddam, Bush preferred to use force rather than diplomacy to solve problems. Unlike Saddam, Bush was better at tearing down public services than building them up.

If Bush was wise he would know that an outsider cannot mandate peace in Iraq. If he had a modicum of self-awareness, he would know that if it was remotely possible for a foreign leader to broker peace, even as the “mission accomplished” aviator that he fancies himself, he just doesn’t have the “right stuff”.

(Hal Brown is a clinical social worker and former mental health center director who is mostly retired from his private psychotherapy practice. He writes on the psychopathology of public figures and other topics that pique his interest. He can be found online at

12 thoughts on “Bush is no Gandhi”

  1. Bush’s plan was never to bring unity to Iraq or even freedom for Iraqis. The plan was to secure military bases and oil reserves. Mission accomplished. There will be no leaving Iraq, it will be on to Iran and Syria. That is the plan. Total control of the middle east placing Isreal as favored state with expanded borders. Why else would we build nine large military bases and an embassy the size of Boston? Bush is successful in his mission, although a failure in the eyes of the innocent. He doesn’t give a dam what commoners think.

  2. Seems obscene to even mention

    Shrub in the same breath as Ghandi. To use a folksy descriptive term once common in my area: Bush is nothing but a dirty ole shit eatin’ dog.

  3. I appreciate everyone who took the time to comment on my first column. Thank you.

    I find that I wasn’t the only one to think of India’s fight for independence and Gandhi, and Iraq.

    For example, in today’s the International Herald Tribune, about Iraq’s Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki


    “Nor can the Iraqi leader fulfill his other major promise: to lead a new effort to reconcile the warring sects of Iraq. HE IS NOT ANOTHER GANDHI, but rather a leader of the fiercely sectarian Dawa Party. It is very much as a militant Shiite that he speaks out. It would be remarkable if Maliki could even reconcile with his Shiite rivals, let alone the Sunni insurgents.” (emphasis added)


    The fact is that there is not now and has never been an Iraqi Gandhi (that is unless you count Saddam who did unify the country although certainlly not as a pacifist).

    It certainly isn’t Maliki who is nothing but a Shiite partisan and who could never unite Sunnis and Kurds and Shiites. And he could never motivate them to throw al Qaeda out of the country.

    Not to get too snarky, but let’s face it, if George W. Bush went on a hunger strike until death to stop the sectarian violence in Iraq, like Gandhi did in India, in a pretty short time we’d have a new president.


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: