In a Time of UniversalĀ Deceit, Telling the Truth is Revolutionary.
Sunday, June 23, 2024

Bush ignores any ideas but his own on Iraq

An increasingly defiant George W. Bush is standing firm on his Iraq policy, says he will "not be rushed" into making changes and has made it clear that no one, including Vice President Dick Cheney, will tell him what to do.

Bush said Wednesday he has heard both some interesting ideas and some "ideas that would lead to defeat."

An increasingly defiant George W. Bush is standing firm on his Iraq policy, says he will "not be rushed" into making changes and has made it clear that no one, including Vice President Dick Cheney, will tell him what to do.

Bush said Wednesday he has heard both some interesting ideas and some "ideas that would lead to defeat."

"And I reject those ideas," Bush said after meeting with top generals and Defense Department officials at the Pentagon. He said those ideas included "leaving before the job is done, ideas such as not helping this (Iraqi) government take the necessary and hard steps to be able to do its job."

White House insiders also say Bush is distancing himself more and more from Vice President Dick Cheney who, along with outgoing Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, is considered the real architect of the administration’s war policy in Iraq.

Instead, Bush is making it clear that he, and he alone, will decide what happens in Iraq and that his policy will not be guided by Cheney, the Irag Study Group, or his father, former President George H.W. Bush.

Bush spoke with reporters after wrapping up a round of high-level talks on revising his Iraq war policy. Earlier he spoke by telephone with two Kurdish leaders in Iraq as part of what the White House called efforts to forge a "moderate bloc" behind the shaky central government in Baghdad.

Standing with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Bush said he and the nation’s top military commanders had "a very candid and fruitful discussion about how to secure this country and about how to win a war that we now find ourselves in."

Bush made it clear that "there has been a lot of violence in Iraq. The violence has been horrific."

Although the White House had initially suggested that Bush would deliver his speech on Iraq strategy before Christmas, he has decided to delay it until early next year.

Defending that decision, Bush said, "I will not be rushed into making a difficult decision … a necessary decision."

Joined by Vice President Dick Cheney, incoming Defense Secretary Robert Gates and outgoing Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, Bush met with the military leaders and other members of his national security team at the Pentagon, where war commanders are calling for more U.S. trainers and equipment for beleaguered Iraqi forces.

He addressed some of his remarks to members of the nation’s military, including some 140,000 now stationed in Iraq. "I appreciate their sacrifices, and I want them to know I’m focused on developing a strategy that will help them achieve their mission," the president said.

"I know there is a lot of debate at home, and our troops pay attention to that debate," Bush said. Directing his remarks to the troops, he said: "It means I’m listening to a lot of advice to develop a strategy to help you succeed."

Bush’s meeting at the Pentagon lasted more than 90 minutes.

Bush said part of the reason for his putting off his speech to next year was to allow Gates to familiarize himself with the top defense job "and be part of this debate."

"At the appropriate time, I’ll stand up in front of the nation and say, `here’s where we’re headed,’" Bush said.

Bush pledged anew to work with the Democratic-controlled Congress that convenes in January "to forge greater bipartisan consensus" on Iraq policy.

Asked by a reporter if recommendations made a week ago by the bipartisan Iraq Study Group included some of the bad advice he had cited, Bush said that his opinion of the report "hasn’t changed."

"I thought it was interesting that Republicans and Democrats could work in concert to help achieve an objective," Bush said. The panel was headed by former Republican Secretary of State James A. Baker III and former Rep. Lee Hamilton, D-Ind.

On Tuesday, in similar discussions with field commanders, Bush heard Gen. John Abizaid, top U.S. commander in the Middle East, and Gen. George Casey, the top general in Iraq, ask the administration to pour increased funding into more armored vehicles, body armor and other critical equipment for the Iraqis, said a defense specialist familiar with the meetings. The source requested anonymity because the discussions were private.

Abizaid has told the Senate Armed Services Committee that troop levels in Iraq need to stay fairly stable and the use of military adviser teams expanded. About 140,000 U.S. troops and about 5,000 advisers are in Iraq.

The message to Bush, the defense specialist said, is that the U.S. cannot withdraw a substantial number of combat troops by early 2008, as suggested by the independent commission on Iraq, because the Iraqis will not be ready to assume control of their country.

Iraqi leaders, meanwhile, last month presented Bush with a plan for its troops to assume primary responsibility for security in Baghdad early next year and that U.S. troops be shifted to the capital’s periphery, The New York Times reported on its Web site Tuesday night.

Bush already has visited this week with State Department officials to review options, hosted a few outside Iraq experts, and met with Iraq’s Sunni vice president, Tariq al-Hashemi. Last week, the president held talks with the leader of the largest Shiite bloc in Iraq’s parliament, Abdul-Aziz al-Hakim, and with British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the president’s staunchest war ally.

On Wednesday, Bush placed calls to Iraqi President Jalal Talabani, a Kurd, and Massoud Barzani, president of the Kurdish region.

Bush’s discussions across Iraq’s ethnic and religious lines come as major partners in the country’s governing coalition are in behind-the-scenes talks to form a new parliamentary bloc and sideline supporters of the radical Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr, a vehement opponent of the U.S. military presence and the main patron of Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. There is discontent in Iraq and within the Bush administration over al-Maliki’s failure to rein in Shiite militias and quell raging violence.

(Includes information from The Associated Press, Reuters and AFP)

17 thoughts on “Bush ignores any ideas but his own on Iraq”

  1. Some peopole think subbornness is a virtue, they stick with a plan just to stick with it, no matter whether or not it works. Mianly it’s to keep from admitting that they were wrong in the first place. And you know the old saying, “It’s a lady’s perogative to change her mind?” That implies that a man, a REAL man, sticks with his mistake! This is Bush’s think, he won’t admit he’s wrong because that makes him look like less than a man, and so other men, and women, get killed in Iraq.

  2. Take his ball and go home? He should have gone home to mommy babs a long time ago.

    He wouldn’t be missed out there in the brush at Crawford Ranch.

  3. Bush calling Talabani…
    Would this be the first contact between the “Head Kurd” and the “Head Turd”?

  4. Once again bush refuses to adhere to the Constitution and recognize, We the people, want a change in his war policy. When a family and personal friend, with more experience, has told him the truth about the war in Iraq and only through change in policy and stratgety will give a chance for victory and bush rejects the idea, shows the man is unfit to lead. He is acting more like a child who will take his ball home, unless everybody plays his way. The Democrats have taken Impeachment off their agenda after winning control of both Houses. They should give serious thought to reinstate Impeachment, before the Three Thousandth soldier gives his or her life to the losing war.

  5. It’s an unbelievable nightmare. Isn’t this taxation without representation? The entire country and the world is being held hostage by this incompetent, impossibly stubborn egomaniacal dictator. Ignorance is bad. Arrogance is bad. Together, they are dangerous. If Bush is so committed to this war in Iraq, he should send his own twin daughters there to fight in it. Maybe then he will appreciate what he is sending sons and daughters to. I’m so disgusted.

  6. Bush reminds me of Corporal Adolf Hitler in WWll
    He fought the General Staff and Field Marshalls, until he finally lost the war with his stubborn, foolish ignorance of war.

  7. By the time I was in fifth grade, I knew it’s not the president’s job to decide what’s best for the nation. If only George’s tiny little brain had been able to grasp it too.

  8. Now we know what it is like to be ruled by a madman. Up until Bush, Richard Nixon is as close as we got. We now have one more thing in common with Uganda, Chile, and other countries that have been controlled by despots.

Comments are closed.