Google

Web Capitol Hill Blue

 
July 9, 2008 - 6:39am.

Barack Obama is not an acceptable choice for President of the United States as long as he supports the rights-robbing USA Patriot Act.

Obama was not in the Senate when the Bush Administration rammed the Constitution-shredding Patriot Act through Congress in the shell-shocked days following the 9/11 terrorist attacks but he was around in March 1, 2006 when the vote came up to reauthorize the unrelenting assault on the freedoms that once formed the foundations of this nation.

He voted to reauthorize the law, giving the Bush administration more authority to strip away the liberties of Americans.

I made a vow on that day to never, ever, support or vote for any slimeball political hack who voted for the Patriot Act.

Barack Obama is one of those slimeballs. The last thing we need is another President who supports taking away the freedoms that once defined this country.

Sometime today, Obama will reaffirm his membership in the Hall of Slimeballs when he votes yes on reauthorization of the FISA Act, the bill that gives the government unwarranted rights to tap the phones of Americans and grants immunity to the telecom companies who conspired with the Bush administration.

So much for the great Black hope. The only change Obama offers is in color of skin. When it comes to principle, he is as black-hearted as the man he seeks to replace: No morality, no honesty, no desire to keep his word.

With the Democratic nomination assured, Obama now seeks to sell his soul for votes at every opportunity - from embracing Bush's faith-based initiative that clearly violates the Constitutional principle of separating church and state to announcing that he will "refine" his position on the illegal and immoral Iraq war.

Obama claims he is a "progressive." Bullshit. He's about as progressive as Pat Robertson. As he moves more and more towards the "center," he proves that he's just another good old boy in a political system driven by focus groups, polls and the shifting mood of the electorate.

Politicians sell their souls for a variety of reasons. Some do it for votes. Others for campaign contributions. Others for money under the table and still others for a secure financial future. All are traitors to the Constitution they take an oath to uphold. All put their own personal agendas ahead of the nation they promise to serve.

Obama promised us he would be different.

He lied.

Just like any politician.

»

Every single candidate in

Every single candidate in the November election voted for the Patriot's Act; McCain, Obama (renewal) and Barr! So what do we do about it? I can think of only one Congressman who did not vote for this hideous action against Americans.....Yes, it was Congressman Ron Paul of Texas.

We here at CHB care deeply for our Freedoms but without a massive movement what good are we?

»

BRAVO! Agreed.

BRAVO! Agreed.

»

I support your enthusiastic

I support your enthusiastic agreement Rob. Possibly we are slowly but surely developing consensus on this site as to which candidate would make the best "monkeywrench" to be thrown into the business as usual Washington politics gearworks.

Congressman Paul is known as "Dr. No" in the House because he simply votes no on 99.9 percent of legislation put before that body. I guess he's as pure as "Ivory Snow"... /:) Do they even make that product anymore?

Carl Nemo **==

»

You know what Doug? You're

You know what Doug? You're a bit too late on this Rant. Where were you in January, February, etc. This is the lot we are stuck with...McCain, Obama, Nadar, Barr and the Socialist candidate. You can write in Ron Paul's name but it won't do any good to get him elected. You could advocate for everyone to stay home but that's not going to happen either because the neo-con crazies will still vote their agenda.

You say its time to change the govt but the only thing I have heard is anger. You should read my last blog.

If we get McCain we will have 4 more years of unacceptable policies. We will have a man who wants to make Bush's tax cuts for the rich permanent, wants to cut corporate taxes and who wants the federal govt to tell me what I can or cannot do with my body.

We won't have a snowball's chance in hell of taking back our country.

The first thing we need to do is get rid of the neo-con cockroaches that infest our govt. After we do that, there are many ways to take back our govt. But until and unless it happens our country is doomed.

So rant all you want. Get the anger out. Because until you let go of it, there's no way that you will have anything constructive and positive in the way of changes to offer.

I was once you. I even moved to another country because I was so angry with our country and our government. But I found out that there is no place to go. We can not run away from what is happening. We have to stay and fight it any ways we can.

And since this is a battle of words, then that's what I will use.

You understand the game of politics since you have been in it. You understand the seriousness of the matter that we face. But you don't offer anything constructive. Anger is not constructive unless it's put into positive action.

»

A bit late? I beg to differ.

A bit late? I beg to differ. Here's what I wrote on November 21, 2007:

 

In the end, Americans will most likely elect another flawed leader who is not up to the job of leading this country out of the morass left by previous administrations and a government ruled by scandal, hidden agendas and votes for sale to the highest bidder.

America is long past the point where an election can change its course. Too many voters foolishly believed that simply putting the Democrats back in charge of Congress in the 2006 mid-term elections would end George W. Bush's failed Iraq war and, by some miracle, restore honesty and integrity to our government.

Didn't happen: Couldn't happen: Won't happen. America is a victim of its own flawed belief in freedoms that don't exist, saviors who aren't real and expectations that cannot be met. We put our trust in political leaders with too many shortcomings and then expect them to rise above their levels of incompetence.

I wrote this on November 7, 2007:

 

Politics is a business where the bottom line is delivering at least 50.1 percent of the election results on the First Tuesday of November. If the system must be manipulated to deliver that bottom line then so be it. Democracy ceased to exist in this country decades ago, if it ever in fact existed, and the system of government today is a far cry from the Democratic Republic envisioned by the framers of the Constitution.

The anger that pours $4.3 million into Ron Paul's campaign coffers in a day's time is growing and present but anger alone cannot change the course of American history. The system still favors the status quo and it is controlled by those who benefit most from it.

»

Ok, so you were right. It

Ok, so you were right. It still doesn't offer any solutions. That's what people are looking for....solutions.....not anger, not politics.

Don't get me wrong, I love your rants. I'm just still waiting for more meat than a bunch of angry words.

»

We CAN do better! FREE

We CAN do better!

FREE AMERICA

DIRECT DEMOCRACY

»

It's good to see you back to

It's good to see you back to form, Doug.

»

When I heard Oprah was

When I heard Oprah was backing Obama I knew something was fishy in the district. Oprah is apolitical so there had to be some arm twisting to get her backing.
The biggest problem today is there are no honest and peaceful solutions to rid our country of these politicians who are puppets of fill in the blank__________
"Obama now seeks to sell his soul."
Obama sold his soul when he was a go-fer working for the Chicago Machine.......
He's not that innocent,
And please don't call me a anti-semite or anti-black, I would consider myself a liberal who gives people the chance they deserve if they worked hard and long for it.

»

Pollchecker. Why slam into

Pollchecker. Why slam into Doug? He got fed up as we all have done and then returned with a change of pace; as we all have done.

I think in terms of the future. When we get all bent out of shape by a possible fix; we need to do exactly what Doug has done and take a cold hard look at this change.

I go back here all the way to 2000 when I tried to warn CHB readers the possible problem with Bush. It didn't work but few did the research that I did on the subject. Doug has done his research in 2008.

There isn't anyone here who knows that again we have been duped by corruption but it hasn't doomed the Republic yet... We have one hell of a lot to do before the next Congressional election in 2010 and more work on locating a candidate who will straighten us out on our priorities. Is demanding universal health insurance more important than firming up the Constitution to keep us out of forcing a Democracy on the planet? Is protecting our borders more important than protecting Israel?

Doug does not direct our votes but brings us updated information to make certain we know who we want or don't want in the White House. Clearly we have no options for a fix in November. But can we at least take a look at Paul's agenda for a possible change in our next election? He is too old (did I say that?) but his agenda may end up saving this sorry nation after the last blast of corruption.

At this point, I want all opinions voiced here. I want yours as well.

»

Sandra -- I am not slamming

Sandra -- I am not slamming Doug. But I'm not a Doug groupie that I'm going to let something go unaddressed. Just because people don't agree doesn't mean they can't have positive discussions. I realize that is anti-productive during GW's reign, but that is coming to an end soon.

However, we need solutions not more angry rhetoric. doug writes a great rant but I don't hear any solutions and this rant is a little late.

I'm not going anywhere. All's fair in love, war, and politics and as far as I am concerned this all all three.

I too, warned peope about GW in 2000. I didn't believe people would be stupid enough to elect him twice but they did. So I will not idly sit by and watch Bush/McCain take control of our country for 4 more years.

It's time to turn the angry rhetoric into actions. It's easy to sit back and write great words. It's harder to take those words, those sentiments and lead other's into positive and constructive changes.

And that my friend is what this country desparately needs.

»

Perhaps we don't deserve to

Perhaps we don't deserve to have our country back. Perhaps losing it all is what it will take to get people off their butts and into the streets. If that is the case then I will see you all in hell. That is where we are going if we don't do something now. Repent all you want. We are all responsible for allowing this mess and we will all burn for it if we don't stop it. Suburban Jesus is a lie. God is going to go Old Testament style on our collective butts.

»

I will never accept a

I will never accept a monster God who will correct our problems for us. In my world there is no God. We, as individuals are the power and the source of corrections. All we need is to sit down and talk about what we want corrected. Doug has given us a place to do this.

Our choice is to research and discover what it is we want from a Republic; or would we prefer an Empire where the world will be looking at an American leader for their instructions? I am far more worried about the next generations missing out on the history of American freedoms. Christians are becoming lazy and would rather pray than act! We must act! We have a stage and we have an audience and we must market our product and increase our audience.

Look at Huffington Post. It is impossible to read that site all the way through on any given day. Here we have a forum along side of this blog to vent and discuss. I see no reason we can't become as popular and as important as Huffington. Doug has gathered a load of excellent thinkers here and it just gets better all the time. I believe CHB could lead the internet in non-partisan issues. But we must decide on what we want from the government. How much government do we want? We have more government at this time than ever before and nothing seems to be working. Can we start limiting the very authority that has removed many of our freedoms?

You will not see me in hell!

»

Barack Obama posted the

Barack Obama posted the following on HUFFINGTON on July 3rd:

My position on FISA (link)

»

Thanks, Hal, I posted that

Thanks, Hal, I posted that as well. It's a good piece that I can live with.....FOR NOW!

That doesn't mean I am letting him off the hook. But I haven't seen a politician address an issue in such a way in a very, VERY long time.

»

When the Democratic

When the Democratic nomination clusterphuque was in progress and you were devoting considerable attention to Hillary Clinton, you were frequently accused of being pro-Obama and/or anti-Clinton and/or anti-woman - but you told everyone that Obama would get your attention when you thought it necessary.

Now that you have pointed out that Mr. Change is wearing no clothes, I assume that many will now call you racist and/or pro-McCain. But I see you as doing what you said a good journalist should do: Comfort the afflicted and afflict the comfortable.

If we are fortunate, perhaps rants like this one and yesterdays will inspire a lot of people simply to opt out, to de-legitimize the system through non participation - in effect, to "vote with our feet."

Most sincerely,

T. J. Flapsaddle

»

That is exactly what has

That is exactly what has been happening in the past 2 decades and we find ourselves with the biggest bozo of all who thumbs his nose at the country, the constitution and everything we hold dear. No, that's nothing but a sure path to 4 more years of Bush/McCain!

But perhaps that is what you would prefer?(wink)

»

I am just waxing Hegelian.

I am just waxing Hegelian. Let the process continue to unfold into one logical absurdity after another until it collapses under the weight of its own internal contradictions.

Logically, the civic problem would be solved by greater participation to throw the rascals out; however, that is not happening. Going the other way, fewer and fewer participate and the system becomes meaningless.

Perhaps a McCain win might be the straw that breaks the camel's back?

Most sincerely,

T. J. Flapsaddle

»

Perhaps a McCain win might

Perhaps a McCain win might be the straw that breaks the camel's back?

Unfortunately that logic was applied to the election of 2000 and 2004? How much further do we have to go, how much more pain do the sheep have to feel? It is not just as simple as what happens to us TODAY. It is about the future of our country, our children, etc.,etc., which I think we all agree is pretty damn important. Important enough, that the majority of the people here in the US, supported the invasion of Iraq and the 4000 lives it cost.

Is it a wonder they can't look at the faces on the quilt I made? Is it a wonder they show no empathy for the plights of their family's except for catchy slogans? Maybe I didn't understand it, but after making and displaying Iraq Memorial Quilt I came to understand it.

America is ashamed of our behavior and looking for a way out. One thing we know for 99% certainty because he has said it over and over again, is that McCain won't be the one to do that.

»

I appreciate the depth of

I appreciate the depth of your concern, Pollchecker, but I refuse to be chevied into the logical fallacy of the false alternative. I will not vote for a heaping pile of feline feces because it is somehow supposed to be better than a heaping pile of canine crap.

We have far to many people now indulging in the political equivalent of skatophagia.

Most sincerely,

T. J. Flapsaddle

»

Using big words doesn't

Using big words doesn't always mean that people don't understand the intent behind them, tj.

Personally, I would only ask people to vote...period...for whoever they believe in their heart best represents their views.

I still believe that is the first step to overcoming the apathetic quagmire we find ourselves in the midst of.

People seem to be asking for some kind of action and it seemed to me you were advocating more of the same inaction.

»

That's exactly why I do not

That's exactly why I do not vote for a presidential choice - there is no choice!

Now, that does not mean I don't express an opinion - I write in the name of the person - Ron Paul, in this case - who best reflects my views. No, he isn't a candidate; no, he will not be swept in on a tide of popular sentiment, defying the two parties. Barred a write-in, I will deface the presidential part of my ballot to render it incapable of being stolen by either pretender to be the next White House squatter.

Both Mr. Change and Mr. Rebushing can go piss up a rope.

I'll still cast votes for local offices - I have genuine influence there - and I'll vote for my Congressman - Ron Paul.

Most sincerely,

T. J. Flapsaddle

»

At least two of us will be

At least two of us will be writing in Ron Paul. Maybe he does have a chance? Will anyone else join us?

»

Historical images: Colonel

Historical images:

Colonel William Barrett Travis mustering the garrison of the Alamo, draws a line in the sand with his saber and invites all who believe in their cause to join him on that side of the line.

The Duke of Wellington on having the Black Watch stand-to at Quatre Bras: "They will not run away and it will take a long time to kill all of them."

Most sincerely,

T. J. Flapsaddle

»

Ironic, that this posts

Ironic, that this posts quotes from men of action and your intial comments advocated for inaction.

If we are fortunate, perhaps rants like this one and yesterdays will inspire a lot of people simply to opt out, to de-legitimize the system through non participation - in effect, to "vote with our feet."

If this type of participation had been followed at the Alamo, Texas would be just another Mexican state.

Excuse me if I choose to continue to advocate for actions of any kind while I still am free to do so.

»

Exactly! Just as I - and

Exactly! Just as I - and apparently a few others - plan to advocate their form of action while they, too, are free to do so.

Travis did not force his men to stay at gunpoint - which he could have - but offered them as free men the choice of how to serve their cause, a cause which I believe that all but one chose to stand and make the ultimate premium payment to liberty. They, too, advocated for action that was personally lethal but ultimately of great value to their cause.

Had the Duke paid attention a couple of days earlier to what his CoS said about Napoleon, then he might not have had to stand such a small force against Napoleon's advancing army. They did not have the choice Travis offered his men.

Most sincerely,

T. J. Flapsaddle

»

Make that three ! Protest

Make that three ! Protest Vote.

»

Great you're back.....but

Great you're back.....but who's the choice?
Sure ! Barack a self-serving pol as are 100 per cent of folks labeled politicians. However, Barack is certainly more akin to the human race than the hideous Hillary,or the moronically deranged McCain or, indeed, any of the other legitimate candidates.

»

Sounds like someone is

Sounds like someone is finally realizing what I was saying about any candidate active in the Chicago ( Obamamama ) political scene and the boys from Chicago who were products of the Machine.

Obamamama is worse. He gathers supporters under false pretenses.

I do not trust him

»

I don't trust any

I don't trust any politician. My father who was very active in politics awhile back says he never met an honest man who didn't become a crook once he took office.

It has ALWAYS been nothing but the lesser of 2 evils based on a very expensive con job. SO?

I repeat, that the apathy about the system is what has brought us to this place. And mostly what I hear here is a call to more apathy.

Well, those crazy neo-cons are going to vote and participate even if the rest of us don't and personally I'm sick of them deciding my fate, my children's future.

I am just as angry as Doug but now is the time to lead not just rant ESPECIALLY if you are going to call someone who has the balls to do something UNFIT!

»

Capitol Hill Blue's columnists, blogs and reader comments

Capitol Hill Blue is an independent, non-partisan news site that belongs to no political party and subscribes to no political or philosophical point-of-view. Our columnists are welcome to their opinions but readers should understand that their views do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of this web site. We also welcome comments to selected opinion columns and in our popular ReaderRant discussion forum. Please remember, however, that we believe in civility on this web site and comments may be reviewed, moderated or removed if we feel they contain obscenities, racism, bigotry, anti-Semitic remarks or attack other posters. Our goal is reasoned discussion on issues facing this nation and we do not feel that goal is served by personal attacks and by seeing how many cute adjectives you can attach to an elected official or politician's name.

Copyright © 2008 Capitol Hill Blue

Sign up for Capitol Hill Blue's email newsletter
Get our headlines each morning.

Email:

User login