Google

Web Capitol Hill Blue

 
July 2, 2008 - 6:59am.

Satire, at its best, is an artful blend of subtlety and wit. But often it plunges into heavy-handed ways. Then it becomes insufferably witless.

Live from New York, we've seen satire suffer under the "Saturday Night Live Syndrome" of ham-fisted un-funniness. Now this: Live From Washington -- it's the Bush White House.

Unwatched and uncovered in these lame duck days, the Bush White House was just revealed to have performed a heavy-handed takeoff of an old "Saturday Night Live" skit. It's the one featuring a petulant child who doesn't want to hear anyone giving do-this, do-that orders -- and childishly covers both ears while screeching, "I can't hear you! I can't hear you!"

On June 25, The New York Times' Felicity Barringer unearthed a front-page-type scoop that wound up on page A15 (perhaps it was played way back because it left the Washington press corps about as red-faced as the policy-makers we cover, as it was about a story that happened in December and was missed by all until now.)

The next day, The Washington Post's Juliet Eilperin followed the competition's exclusive and added a few fun details. Piecing them together, here's what we know happened:

In December, the federal Environmental Protection Agency responded to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling by drafting a rule setting limits on greenhouse-gas emissions and stating this was being done because the emissions constitute a threat to public welfare. (In April 2007, the Supreme Court had ruled that the Bush EPA violated the Clean Air Act by refusing to look into whether emissions contribute to global warming and should be limited.)

At 2:17 PM on Dec. 5, 2007, EPA Associate Deputy Administrator Jason Burnett sent it via email to the White House Office of Management and Budget. (Alas, the official on the receiving end remains so-far unidentified.)

At 2:25 PM, an unidentified White House person telephoned Burnett ordering him to hold off on sending what he had just sent. Then the White House official who is the decider on such things decided the email would not be opened. The unnamed White House or OMB person then ordered the EPA's Burnett to un-send the EPA email. Burnett refused to call back his email, which after all contained the agency's answer to the Supreme Court.

It has languished, unopened yet unrecalled, in what Barringer described as "email limbo" ever since.

Meanwhile, the Bush White House thinking on the crisis of the ozone has evolved, though it has moved at the speed of slow ooze even as President Bush promised action to protect against global warming. The White House is not yet up to many of the EPA's own experts, who appear far closer to the broad and growing global consensus that greenhouse gas emissions are a clear and present threat.

Apparently the EPA's leader, Administrator Stephen L. Johnson, is not where many of his staff experts are, either. Under his watch, the EPA's sent-but-never-opened proposed rule has been significantly watered down so it could be made public this week, the Times and the Post reported.

"Over the past five days, the officials said, the White House successfully put pressure on the EPA to eliminate large sections of the original analysis that supported regulation, including a finding that tough regulation of motor vehicle emissions could produce $500 billion to $2 trillion in economic benefits over the next 32 years," reported the Times.

While the Bush deciders were careful to move at what they thought was a glacial pace, it turned out that the glaciers were moving much faster. Ice is disappearing at the North Pole at such a rapid rate that the polar ice cap could actually disappear -- not in some distant year, but perhaps even by the end of this summer. That news from the National Snow and Ice Data Center in Boulder, Colo., made a big news splash around the planet, from The Independent in London to the China Post in Taipei. But it was just a blip in Washington.

Not to worry. Live on the EPA's website, you can find a world of assurance, including EPA chief Johnson's pledged "Action Plan." It says: "EPA will accelerate the pace of environmental protection by taking actions that produce environmental results and are accountable to the public, and by embracing the tools of innovation and collaboration -- all the while, ensuring that the best available science remains at the center of our decision making."

It's great to see that someone in Washington is still performing, live on the Internet, the subtle art of satire.

 

(Martin Schram writes political analysis for Scripps Howard News Service. E-mail him at martin.schram(at)gmail.com.)

»

"Ice is disappearing at the

"Ice is disappearing at the North Pole at such a rapid rate that the polar ice cap could actually disappear -- not in some distant year, but perhaps even by the end of this summer."

Oh. I see. Well. Use Google Earth to take a look at the north pole. Tell me if you can find any ice there. Are we stupid? Do they think NO ONE is going to do so? Did they forget that Google Earth exists?

-- Kent Shaw

»

The unnamed White House or

The unnamed White House or OMB person then ordered the EPA's Burnett to un-send the EPA email.

Hmmmm, how do you unsend an email? I have never heard of Unsending an email? But if he sent the email it will never go away. So all we have to do is wait....it will come out...eventually.

»

AOL has a way to unsend an

AOL has a way to unsend an email.

»

Google Earth's images are

Google Earth's images are not recent. They are usually at least 2 years old, and many are from 10-15 years ago.

The ice really is disappearing. There really may not be any North Pole ice within our lives. But is it really a man-made problem?

That isn't so clear as the Earth's temperature has always been in flux. It could be solar activity. It could be entirely natural.

It could be they just want to tax us more, hence the emphasis on how much revenue they can bring in by "regulating" (TAXING) us more. The Council on Foreign Relations and Club of Rome are on record saying they will use global warming as an excuse to raise taxes and bring us all under their control in the name of the planet.

"In a report titled "The First Global Revolution" (1991) published by the Club of Rome, a globalist think tank, we find the following statement: "In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.... All these dangers are caused by human intervention... The real enemy, then, is humanity itself."

"Richard Haass, the current president of the Council on Foreign Relations, stated in his article "State sovereignty must be altered in globalized era," that a system of world government must be created and sovereignty eliminated in order to fight global warming, as well as terrorism. "Moreover, states must be prepared to cede some sovereignty to world bodies if the international system is to function," says Haass. "Globalization thus implies that sovereignty is not only becoming weaker in reality, but that it needs to become weaker. States would be wise to weaken sovereignty in order to protect themselves..."

Global warming is occuring, but don't let them tax us more to "fight" it while they don't allow solar, wind, or tidal projects and instead push coal, oil, and nuclear power. It just does not make any sense!

It's all about money and power, not saving the planet!

»

Isn't it disgusting, how

Isn't it disgusting, how we've all just become pawns in the power-mongers games? We have been warned for most of my lifetime of global warming, greenhouse gasses, etc... and now, I've noticed just in the past couple of weeks, suddenly all the MSM is about "going green".

It's all just control games by corporations and those in government who are in their pocket. How sad that most Americans feel powerless to control their own destiny, and just let these Cretins run it all into the ground.

»

Capitol Hill Blue's columnists, blogs and reader comments

Capitol Hill Blue is an independent, non-partisan news site that belongs to no political party and subscribes to no political or philosophical point-of-view. Our columnists are welcome to their opinions but readers should understand that their views do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of this web site. We also welcome comments to selected opinion columns and in our popular ReaderRant discussion forum. Please remember, however, that we believe in civility on this web site and comments may be reviewed, moderated or removed if we feel they contain obscenities, racism, bigotry, anti-Semitic remarks or attack other posters. Our goal is reasoned discussion on issues facing this nation and we do not feel that goal is served by personal attacks and by seeing how many cute adjectives you can attach to an elected official or politician's name.

Copyright © 2008 Capitol Hill Blue

Sign up for Capitol Hill Blue's email newsletter
Get our headlines each morning.

Email:

User login