Google

Web Capitol Hill Blue

 
June 27, 2008 - 12:33pm.

AMERICA IN 2008

I keep wondering why Bush went into Iraq. His axis of evil pointed to Saddam even if the rest of us had doubts. Or was it for the oil as McCain and many other Conservatives have admitted? Could it have come from his father’s agenda of forcing Democracy in the Middle East to make them appreciate America? Could it have come from the religious right to exterminate Islam?

Has anyone looked at the consequences of this action that almost from day one began removing our individual rights to privacy and our communications with each other and even having the government keep an eye on our internet sites?

Did the Americans elect G.W. Bush because he was a Republican who promised bans on abortions, gay marriages and death with dignity? Did the American voters decide they were not able to decide on their own actions and needed the government to ban other things as they did with selling alcohol and buying illegal drugs?

Did the American family and church leaders simply quit setting moral laws and rules for the families? The churches were delighted at having federal grant money handed to them and the heads of the households sat back and waited for legislation that would make their kids behave.

For the first time in my political history I saw an entire Political Party start to act as if they had the authority to be involved in our personal and private choices. From mandating Sex Education into our schools to allowing the schools to drug the children at will. Reading scores fell and discipline was gone all through the grades. Anyone who has read Orwell can see the warnings clearly. Except instead of Big Daddy telling the people how to think and act, we had television showing how to disregard the family rules. The children ran the households and set the standards for a lack of honesty and integrity. An entire generation lapped up this horror and we lost a generation of strong Americans. Half of them became alcoholics and drug users. Many were tossed out of school and now lead the numbers of those who need welfare to survive.

It would seem that America failed in our dream of freedoms because we overlooked the next generation of Americans. We raised our children to take and not earn. Even on these forums, we see successful earners who must be dishonest as so many others have no working skills. This seems unfair. So most want the redistribution of wealth to fix what is obvious a lack of learning and self improvement among the non-achievers. I was not aware of this difference in American values until I remembered reading the books and essays of Rand.

She had a spirit of achievement in all her characters and I believe that if we look at the next generation we will see the same untrained talents in the children. I read a series of essays by a classroom teacher named Margaret Edson who spent her entire working life in a classroom in the lower schools searching for the interest and talents of her students. I saw her in action on CSPAN and saw the same sparkle in my History teacher back in the mid 40s. They both forced the key words of every discussion. They forced them from their students with an unrelenting push for them to find the key. These are lessons never forgotten.

Where are these teachers in our schools today? Even in the private schools the Bill of Rights is barely mentioned but Jefferson having an affair with one of his slaves is never overlooked.

With this awful middle class culture that is all around us, what future does a free America have? Our spirit is worn out by bad leaders almost since the end of WW2. Was JFK the key who lost his chance too soon? It seems as if from that moment on, we had Presidents whose interest in the Constitution was weak at best. We saw the development of profit made from our wars. As the economy fell our hopes fell with it. When economy took an upward swing so did our hopes. But since 2000 everything has fallen and our hopes have been beaten down to almost nothing.

Do we choose again between only two parties? Can we not locate a voice of freedoms somewhere in America?

Sandra Price

Technorati Tags:
»

Expansive government and a

Expansive government and a general assault on liberty long predates the current administration and even its most recent predecessors.

Had Hillary Clinton's 1993 health-care plan survived, it would have been the most recent usurpation. Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society" of government-directed nostrums was the most recent successful major eruption. Predating that would be the major political "Cambrian Explosion" of FDR and the New Deal. Some consider the Civil War to be the first major and most enduring rape of the concept of limited government.

The Bushes and Clinton are relative pikers compared to these other usurpers.

Most sincerely,

T. J. Flapsaddle

»

The reaction to Bush during

The reaction to Bush during 9/11 set Americans back to the end of WW2. Our spirits were high and our hopes great. It soon became apparent that the man in the White House was a liar, manipulator and a fraud. He pulled out an Executive order written by Clinton during the Y2K scare and embelished it as a threat to all Americans. Some think this was planned to give "W" full powers over the people. I'm one of them.

Hillary's plan fell apart. LBJ was such a disappointment to the people he knew better to run again. There are many Americans who feel the New Deal saved many lives. Our nation crashed and our nation made a correction. Many feel that that was planned well in advance. I remember in junior highschool when I got the basis of the Civil War and found myself on the side of the south. If portions of the USA wanted out of the Union I would be the first to go for it. I have voted for a limited government since the end of WW2.

What I find repulsive is the way Bush and his dad bought the Christian votes to make America an Empire of Christians. The religious right stormed into the parties and the voter bases. The dream of every Christian is to have their nation under their own God. Israel is their model on how to survive and get into heaven.

I posted this commentary on your forum but I knew you would never take me on over there. I was born with more knowledge of America than you ever learned.

At this time, Americans must choose the next POTUS and many do not understand that these candidates are not true to their words or their parties. This forum is fed up with the criminal aspect of the corruption we seem to be unable to change.

»

I keep wondering why Bush

I keep wondering why Bush went into Iraq.

George W went into Iraq as a personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein that he made in 1993 after allegedly Hussein hired assassins to kill his family in Kuwaitt.

BTW, it has been in fact disproven that Hussein did this, but you have to understand GW (which most people don't) to truly understand the limits that man will go....or maybe now people are getting a clue.

The oil money is all payback to Dick and Friends for getting him elected TWICE!

That is the message behind the now infamous "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" sign on the aircraft carrier. That was the message behing televised airing of Hussein's statue coming down. That is why there was no post war planning.

You don't think it was just a coincidence that he just up and decided to run for Governor 3 months later in June 1993...at least that's when the financial exploratory committee (wink, wink) was announced.

He could not be POTUS without any govt experience of ANY KIND!

Gov Anne Richards (RIP)was the perfect candidate to run against as her past with drugs and alcohol was well known. His also infamous past could not be used against him with Richards as an adversary.

And you don't think it was a coincidence that Jeb became Gov of Florida not too long after that, do you? Do you REALLY think this was all a coincidence?

And lastly do you really think the Bush's, Karl Rove and those folks were actively out there campaigning for Dole in 1996? Hell, the MSM talking heads were already talking about GW being the 2000 nominee during the 1996 GOP convention.

If anyone out there still believes this was just a coincidence, I've got some property, I would like to talk to you about buying (very big grin).

»

"Hell, the MSM talking heads

"Hell, the MSM talking heads were already talking about GW being the 2000 nominee during the 1996 GOP convention."

Kinda the same thing that happened with Obama at the 2004 DNC. History repeating itself?

»

"Kinda the same thing that

"Kinda the same thing that happened with Obama at the 2004 DNC. History repeating itself?"

Sorry Grif, I watched the entire Dem convention that was televised in 2004 and all I heard ANYONE talking about was Hillary. I know Obama got good reviews about his speech but I never heard anyone talk about him being a candidate unless it was a VP choice behind HC.

But if that is the case it would bode well for History repeating itself, wouldn't it? One thing we can agree on, no matter what the case, history does have this nasty little habit of repeating itself. You would think we would learn wouldn't you?

»

I remember much talk about

I remember much talk about Obama being a force in the future for the Democrats. Perhaps not during the DNC, but afterwards. I think, at the time, most were thinking further in the future than '08, since '08 was supposed to be Clinton's coronation.

I don't think they counted on how tired most Americans would be of the Clintons by now, no matter how bad Bush got to be. So it would bode well for those that support Obama, not so much for those that don't.

»

The difference is that many

The difference is that many of us who were at that Convention in San Diego in 1996 got a copy of the platform and left. I sat through Dole's weak comments and realized that all actions from a win in 1996 would bring about the end of R v W. This plan to go into the Middle East came from Bush 41 in 1992 and was a call for all Christians to finally make a nation-empire for Christians only. This was the plan for all America.

Does this appeal to most Americans? Am I the one who is so out of step to want my nation to be for all Americans or should I have to register first as a Christian and a Republican after that. I was told in Phoenix that I had to be a Christian to be a Republican. This is dangerous stuff folks. It will stop evolution in its tracks because our survival comes from our brains not from our Gods.

»

I was told in Phoenix that I

I was told in Phoenix that I had to be a Christian to be a Republican.

Wow, that is very telling stuff. And may be indicative of the future of the Republican party as its exclusionary ideas may be its demise.

Sandy, DO NOT CONFUSE GW and his motives with his father's. They are not the same type of men by any stretch of the imagination.

However, I would like to point out that there is a common denominator for the GOP for the past 35 years....called Karl Rove & Dick Cheney.

I find KR's statement the other day about Obama being an Elitist ironic as hell. The Bush's are the most elitist group of people I've ever known. Karl could have only come up with that description if he regularly attended the type of event he described...most often with both Bushes.

Let me tell you something...this Christian stuff came when Rove got in the picture. Believe me neither GW or Dick are saints.

»

Sandy, DO NOT CONFUSE GW and

Sandy, DO NOT CONFUSE GW and his motives with his father's. They are not the same type of men by any stretch of the imagination.

Only difference is his father is many times smarter. Their agendas were pretty much the same. Have you forgotten the new world order speech?

"Poppy" as he was known in the CIA for his heroin dealing from Afghanistan certainly profited well from being CIA director, VP, and POTUS. I still think as VP he was the actual one behind Iran/Contra. Reagan wasn't capable mentally of doing it. Ollie was protecting GHWB and not Reagan.

I think it no coincidence Ollie is now a war commentator on Fox News. Nor is it a coincidence that heroin is flowing from Afghanistan into Europe once again. It's being used to pacify the Europeans into accepting the EU, which is the third test of their world government in Europe. The first was the League of Nations, second the UN.

Carlye is war profiteering quite well today. And while publicly GHWB says little about Junior, privately I'm sure he is quite proud of all the money his boy has made him, as well as the progress toward one world government.

»

Only difference is his

Only difference is his father is many times smarter.

My father, who did business with Bush 41, is quoted as describing George Sr as "a dumb ass" and that was a polite description. That said....what does that tell you about our current POTUS?

As for your New World Order...that's not polite conversation among elitisits like the Bushes.

But is it still another coincidence that the Federalist Society came to power in our govt while Daddy Bush was VP? Or that most of the judges George W has appointed are members of the Federalist Society?

»

Pollchecker the plan for the

Pollchecker the plan for the one world order Empire is clearly described in the Bush Platform of 1992. Perot got a hold of it and blasted it all over the world. It was just before I went on line and when I did I met up with tons of Republicans who were terrified of this world governance of Bush. There was almost a relief that Clinton won. The whole Republican base wanted no global governance and certainly no talks about the one world order. I went on line to research this horrible plan for American to go into the Middle East and force a Democracy. That came under the Bush 41 plan.

I remember that Reagan hated his VP but did not have the strength to dump him. Bush 41 was everything Reagan despised and I know of no one who was in the Reagan camp who voted for Bush. We all signed on for Perot. My area of California carried Perot as we worked the areas between Monterey and Santa Barbara. Our main problem was NAFTA and any Congressman or Senator running in the election lost if they voted for NAFTA.

Bush 41 wrote up the NAFTA agreement but lost his reelection and Clinton simply pushed it in his Congress. We had a pretty good balance during Clinton's terms and we were able to keep the costs down and the wars controlled. But in 2000 the fit hit the shan.

Carl Rove took over "W's" campaign and the dirty tricks on McCain hit way below the belt. Without the Bush group buying the Christian Votes with his federal grants to the churches, that horrible man would still be in Texas. Even before the election the GOP came up with the Prohibitions that would be promised to Falwell and Robertson if they would supply the votes.

I remember writing a magazine article about the new President Bush and a warning about his efforts to charge into the Middle East just as his father had planned to do. Of course he could not, until 9/11. We will eventually know the truth about this horrible man and what he did to New York and the Middle East. I hope you remember these facts as I won't live long enough to see the truth.

Everything I have warned other about has come true. What saddens me are my old Republican friends who fell into the Bush war and have no clue why we invaded Iraq. It was apparently another religious war for Christian America.

»

Again, I say, do not compare

Again, I say, do not compare GW to his Dad. They are not nearly the same.

Here you go Sandra. This is good news.

Hagel, Republican for Now, Says He Has No Plans to Back McCain

Senator Chuck Hagel declined to endorse his party's likely presidential nominee, John McCain, and said he would consider serving as secretary of defense in a Barack Obama administration.

Or how about this piece of news?

GOP reps. advised to avoid party brand

A new playbook for House Republicans urges them to run essentially as independents, showing empathy for voters, emphasizing local issues and ignoring many traditional party campaign practices.

I love this part though

The review found that the losing Republicans failed to successfully establish “themselves and their local brand in contrast to the negative perception of the national GOP.”

“Traditional Republican messages essentially did not work in these campaigns,” the analysis says. “Nationalizing these elections as a choice between a traditional Republican and a traditional Democrat did not work in this political environment.

»

I remember that Reagan hated

I remember that Reagan hated his VP but did not have the strength to dump him.

John W. Hinckley Jr. shot Reagan. Awful big coincidence that the Bush family and the Hinckley family were connected. Now who do you suppose would have benefited Reagan's death?

Could you imagine the uproar should it ever be proven? Republican icon shot by his own for private agenda of world domination! When they say family values they must mean mafia style!

»

woody. Reagan has no plans

woody. Reagan has no plans for world domination. What did you mean?

»

Wonderful summation, Sandra.

Wonderful summation, Sandra.

»

My favorite headline of all

My favorite headline of all time is from the London Daily Mirror after Bush had been re-selected for the second time.

How Can 59,054,087 People Be So Dumb?
http://www.politico.ws/photos/English%20Magazine%2...

Americans are an invented people .. easily frightened, easily manipulated. Karl Rove is far from any real sense of genius, he simply knew that Americans are easy.

Every single thing that was said about Bush/Rove/Cheney and the mindless attack on Iraq has come to be known as fact. Iraq was never a threat and the fraudulent rationale the Bushistas gave for invading Iraq should have been seen for what it was by 8th graders.

"Mushroom clouds in 45 minutes" .. from a regime that had been under sanctions for a dozen years was so incredibly transparent and downright stupid that only the lobotomized mind could have possibly believed that crap.

No need to look too deep for vilians and blame because it lies in the lap of the American people. How could we have possibly been that dumb?

Today the Republican Party is shrinking by the minute and those who supported this maniac regime are scratching their heads in bewilderment.

There is no mystery why this nation is in the crisis we face today. No mystery whatsoever.

»

That's right black. However

That's right black. However on many newspapers and television news channels, it is the American people who are in the wrong and our government must continue in this move to make the middle east into a democracy must be allowed to continue.

Our only hope it to stay in the Democratic Party in the white house and the congress. The next justice must not be selected by anyone of McCain's ilk.

In my world, the GOP blew it in 1992 when the agenda moved into the New World Order which lost Bush 41 his election. Seeing him lose was the first successful election I was ever involved in. I went for Perot with a lot of energy. He was completely against the Nafta crap and felt we could trade with other nations without giving away the store. Our trade deficit is shocking and we lose money with every deal. It get worse every damn year.

»

I agree with much of what

I agree with much of what you say my good sister .. as usual. However, America cannot make the middle east democratic. We aren't even an honest broker in the middle east and we carry no weight there.

WE have proven ourselves that there is a giant gaping hole in the concept of democracy .. MONEY. He who has the money controls the democracy.

In fact, America has morphed from a democracy into a plutocracy where the will of the corporation carries far more weight than the will of the people.

We didn't just suddenly slip into this madness with the selection of George Bush. Our foreign policy has been insane and counter-productive for a lot of years .. through both democratic and republican administrations.

Why does Iran feel the need to protect itself from America and Israel? Because we overthrew their democratically elected government and installed a brutal dictator who brought with him SAVAK, one of the most heinous secret police forces in human history. Israel is loaded to the teeth with nuclear weapons and Iran has every right to seek nukes of its own.

America has its own terrorist training camp right here on US soil in Columbus, Georgia and we've trained and supported legions of terrorists and unleashed them on Latin American countries like a plauge.

America needs to get its own house in order and forgo visions of dominating the world or turning it into our Hollywood version of democracy.

»

"America needs to get its

"America needs to get its own house in order and forgo visions of dominating the world or turning it into our Hollywood version of democracy."

I couldn't agree more with this statement. America needs its independence and stop poking other nations in the eye. We need oil, so we design a great myth and simply go in and take it. War!! naturally!

You should read my emails about how the whole planet is counting on our actions in the Middle East. How many did they send to help us? No, Bush 41 and 43 wanted a war and they came up with the most silly reasons about the world hating us for our freedoms. These two men did more to remove the freedoms than anyone else in my lifetime.

Damnit Black, Americans are going to have to wake up to what is happening in our government. We can only hope that most of those who read here can learn that the current Administration is simply wrong! Any change would be better than what we have at this time. I thought for a minute you might not want this change. I was wrong!

»

»

I do indeed want change, but

I do indeed want change, but I also want to hold Obama's feet to the fire. I do not have any confidence in government to do what is best for this country on its own without its feet being held to the fire.

Here is an article that I completely agree with and may help you understand my position.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jason-rosenbaum/the-...

»

Yes, I understand the

Yes, I understand the comments in the article you linked. I always go into an election with the idea that many need to carefully follow the chosen candidate and keep him on an even keel of representing the voters who elected him. It seems as if the writer is a pure Democrat who expects Obama to stay firmly within the government that the party desires. Personally I feel that the voters really don't care about anything other than restoring our level of peace and prosperity with the dollar value holding at $1.00.

The American debt and deficit is at critical and we cannot expect all of Obama's list of fixes to be instantaneously. I heard him promise a new academic program in our schools. Think about what that means. New teachers, text books and disciplinary rules.

He wants our troops out of Iraq and he knows he cannot pull them out all at once. I would rather that he did just that. He must promise not to allow another Social Conservative to be appointed in the Supreme Court. He owes this to all American women.

He needs a Cabinet that the American people can trust who will prioritize his agenda with careful thought. He must do this in the opwn and with questions asked by the public or press.

Black, I guarantee that I will be a spokesman for all people who want desperately for Obama to win and accomplish what the Bush people did not. America must come first and our Government structures that protect all Americans must be made safe. I think he will be able to work with others across the aisle to accomplish what Bush refused and we must expect the costs of all this to rise until we are made safe. This can be a training ground for unskilled men and women.

Getting him elected will be very difficult but we have no other candidate who can be trusted with the war or the Supreme Court. One step at a time but it doesn't mean we can't list our own priorities. Thanks for the link, I often read HuffingtonPost.

»

I think GWB makes perfect

I think GWB makes perfect sense in the context of his twisted, degenerate religious belief system, which goes about like this: The Arabs and Muslims are evil, since they are not Christian. The Jews, although they are corrupt and unenlightened, must be given EVERYTHING they want, since they were God's Chosen People, up until Christ came along. And even though many if not most Jews will not make the cut when Christ returns, HE will not do so until Israel is calling all the shots. That is to say, Christians will not be sucked through the roofs of their cars on their way to Heaven, during the "rapture", when Christ returns and "rescues" them from the consequences of their own depravity.

There's really nothing Bush has or hasn't done that doesn't make perfect sense, within the context of his twisted little Christian world.

»

Non-Voters: It's All In

Non-Voters: It's All In God's Hands

Here you go, Sandra.

People who believe that God is involved in worldly affairs are less likely to participate in national elections than others, according to a new survey.

The study, which included nearly 1,700 U.S. men and women with an average age of 53, suggests that a person's view of God is a variable that determines whether he or she will donate money to a campaign, read political news, or even vote.

"It can be reasoned that if one believes God determines worldly affairs, then there is little reason for individuals to participate in civic events," study leader Robyn Driskell and her colleagues write in the June issue of the journal Social Science Quarterly. "God is taking care of things."

See it's not Christians that are bad, it's those "Crazy Neo-cons and Right-to-Lifers that enable this garbage.

»

Capitol Hill Blue's columnists, blogs and reader comments

Capitol Hill Blue is an independent, non-partisan news site that belongs to no political party and subscribes to no political or philosophical point-of-view. Our columnists are welcome to their opinions but readers should understand that their views do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of this web site. We also welcome comments to selected opinion columns and in our popular ReaderRant discussion forum. Please remember, however, that we believe in civility on this web site and comments may be reviewed, moderated or removed if we feel they contain obscenities, racism, bigotry, anti-Semitic remarks or attack other posters. Our goal is reasoned discussion on issues facing this nation and we do not feel that goal is served by personal attacks and by seeing how many cute adjectives you can attach to an elected official or politician's name.

Copyright © 2008 Capitol Hill Blue

Sign up for Capitol Hill Blue's email newsletter
Get our headlines each morning.

Email:

User login