Google

Web Capitol Hill Blue

 
June 2, 2008 - 10:20am.

I had planned to do this when I was writing for the home page but am glad I can do it here in a blog.

We are facing an important election in November. I would like to start a priority of issues to be debated here on an old list I came up with in 1998. My priorities may not be yours but should be discussed nonetheless.

NUMBER ONE: Defense and Security

Do we allow continuing production of nuclear ballistic weapons in other nations? If we do then should we not earmark funds for the defense missiles in the United States? Do we dare ask any candidate to answer this?

My second question to any candidate(s) should be: What is more important: Trade Agreements or National Security?

We do not need a “feel good” type of leadership but hard core decisions made under the U.S. Constitution.

Technorati Tags:
»

Retired Air Force General

Retired Air Force General McPeak Bashes McCain

Hey Sandra, here's a present for you. McCain can't win even on National Security. All these retired Generals are itching to get on the record about what is wrong with Bush/McCain War in Iraq.

Retired Air Force General Tony McPeak, a national security adviser to Barack Obama, dropped the hammer on Sen. John McCain today, telling the Washington Times, "It doesn't take very long to uncover national security issues that McCain is weak on...For McCain to think he has a monopoly on virtue in the national security issue is going to be shown a pretty flimsy idea very quickly."

How flimsy and how quickly? As it turns out, very. And critically, McPeak attaches himself to the Obama campaign as someone who got Iraq right.

Or this one?

General Ricardo Sanchez's Book Slams Bush, Iraq Handling

Getting lost in the media furor over McClellan's memoir is the new autobiography of retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, the onetime commander of U.S. troops in Iraq, who is scathing in his assessment that the Bush administration "led America into a strategic blunder of historic proportions."

Among the anecdotes in "Wiser in Battle: A Soldier's Story" is an arresting portrait of Bush after four contractors were killed in Fallujah in 2004, triggering a fierce U.S. response that was reportedly egged on by the president.

During a videoconference with his national security team and generals, Sanchez writes, Bush launched into what he described as a "confused" pep talk:

"Kick ass!" he quotes the president as saying. "If somebody tries to stop the march to democracy, we will seek them out and kill them! We must be tougher than hell! This Vietnam stuff, this is not even close. It is a mind-set. We can't send that message. It's an excuse to prepare us for withdrawal."

For those of you who wonder why some remain anonymous or wait to tell the truth about the Bushes, PLEASE keep this quote in mind.

"we will seek them out and kill them! We must be tougher than hell! This Vietnam stuff, this is not even close. It is a mind-set. "

»

As part of a total overhaul

As part of a total overhaul of our defense/security obligations, we should also consider not doing any more hatchet-jobs for the UN. Is any unnecessary war made more desirable or possibly moral because we have a hall pass from the Security Council? Not only do we not need to be the policeman of the world, we need to stop letting ourselves be deputized for that duty.

While Bush dragged us into a totally unnecessary war in Iraq, we should also remember that Bill Clinton indulged in the pointless slaughter of Serbs - who are even less ephemerally culpable than were the Iraqis - as a part of a "blue-helmet" operation when many of the concerned countries of eastern and southeastern Europe stayed out of it. If the next-door neighbors are not getting involved, why do we come all the way across town with a water hose?

Congress needs to get back to it's constitutional duty of deciding whether or not we are going to war and to stop automatically handing the executive branch a no-limit Visa card with which to play international policeman.

Most sincerely,

T. J. Flapsaddle

»

If I recall, Clinton stayed

If I recall, Clinton stayed out of Serbia until people like REpublican SEnator Bob Dole made an issue about Serbia.

And wasn't it Bush 41, who ORIGINALLY sent troops into Somalia as one of his LAST TASKS as Commander in Chief?

I just don't understand how Republicans CONSISTENTLY attempt to BLAME the Dems for EVERYTHING they do.

The WORST part about it is the GOP is the FIRST AND THE LOUDEST to talk about taking Responsibility for one's actions!

Personally, I believe myself and the rest of the country has had it with this phoniness. If the GOP had an HONEST candidate with some BALLS to stand up to the Republican Political Machine that Scott McClelland clearly details in his latest book, then they might have a future.

But there was not one single candidate with BALLS to do that. McCain ended up the last man standing because he was the ONLY one to CONSISTENTLY support BUSH'S FAILED POLICIES IN IRAQ! So He got the Bushie money!

Oh yes, it was on the sly. Behind the scenes a now bored Karl Rove had been making calls to former Bush donors to ensure that John had enough money to stay in the race. We see the results.

The NUMBER ONE PRIORITY right now, in my opinion, is to do everything possible to ensure that John McCain does not gain the power to impose his aggressive notions in the Middle East!

»

I've no factual dispute with

I've no factual dispute with any of the matters you raise, but...

"If I recall, Clinton stayed out of Serbia until people like REpublican SEnator Bob Dole made an issue about Serbia." (sic)

So, Clinton let himself be hectored into it by a political opponent, and essentially acted - like John Kennedy - on the basis of needing to look "tough"? That's the Billy-dared-me excuse. And the question was, did it become acceptable because the UN sanctioned it?

And wasn't it Bush 41, who ORIGINALLY sent troops into Somalia as one of his LAST TASKS as Commander in Chief?

He did indeed! And that's the Bobby-did-it-first excuse, isn't it? We did not need to be in Somalia either, did we? If the various African nations were not concerned with it, why were we diddling around in a dirt-poor country that did not and could not possibly represent a threat to us? Sorry, I forgot, we also had a hall pass from the UN on that one, to.

I just don't understand how Republicans CONSISTENTLY attempt to BLAME the Dems for EVERYTHING they do.

The WORST part about it is the GOP is the FIRST AND THE LOUDEST to talk about taking Responsibility for one's actions!

I don't think that I've excused any Republican cheerleaders and players either. Both parties have blood on their hands that never needed to be there. My point was that we need to stop letting the UN deputize us and we need to stop letting the squatter in the Oval Office - whatever label s/he wears - volunteering us for a posse when it isn't in our county that the rustling happened.

BTW, unless there are a lot of gold rings coming back in the body bags from Iraq, it's not a necessary war.

Most sincerely,

T. J. Flapsaddle

»

You know Flapsaddle, you're

You know Flapsaddle, you're right! I won't disagree with you. (haha mark this day in history)

It's not a necessary war and never was. It is and always has been a personal vendetta fueled by oil and military industrial money.

And I hope the day that Bush and those who have enabled him for 8 - 10 years (LIKE MCCAIN) are no longer in power, it will TRULY be a day to celebrate......

Perhaps even a National holiday! Ding Dong the Bush is gone, Bush oh Bush, the wicked Bush, Ding Dong the wicked Bush is gone! (harhar) I won't even go into the 2nd verse about our VP (very big snear)......

»

This is no doubt an urban

This is no doubt an urban legend, but it's nonetheless apropos:

Adolf Hitler was very interested in astrology and fortune-telling, and he heard of a Gypsy fortune-teller, a palmist, in the concentration camps who had been frighteningly accurate; he ordered the woman brought to him in order to test her.

He asked her to tell him when he would die, and he offered her his right hand that she might read his palm. The old woman never looked at his hand but instantly looked him in the eyes and said, "you will die on a day that is holy to the Jews!"

Astonished, der Fuehrer asked "on which Jewish holy day?"

"It matters not!" said the wizened crone. "Whatever day that you die will become holy to the Jews."

Most sincerely,

T. J. Flapsaddle

»

Thank you my friend. I'm so

Thank you my friend. I'm so glad this is coming out.

»

It was reported in

It was reported in Australia's news today that Australia is bringing all their troops home from Iraq and the government is now considering allowing John Howard, the former PM, to be tried in International court for war crimes. Would that we Americans would have the cajones to do the same to our President!

Teresa

»

It's a darn good thing that

It's a darn good thing that past POTUS didn't mind meeting with countries we had no ties with otherwise we would not be having an Olympics in China. In fact we might still be fighting some past wars.

Poll: McCain Is Wrong, U.S. Should Engage Iran Diplomatically

And still another little gem for you:

More Headaches for McCain’s Camp

For weeks now, John McCain's presidential campaign has faced awkward questions about the outside activities of several top advisers. Add one more name to the list: former Texas senator Phil Gramm, McCain's longtime friend and one of his five campaign co-chairs. (A sixth, former congressman Tom Loeffler, quit recently after NEWSWEEK reported on his lobbying work for Saudi Arabia.) According to McCain spokeswoman Jill Hazelbaker, the co-chair position affords Gramm "broad input into the structure, financing and conduct of the campaign." She added that Gramm, who has a doctorate in economics, is also "a valued voice on economic policy." Gramm is not a paid McCain adviser, but his day job—vice chairman of a U.S. division of Zurich-based financial giant UBS—could pose new tests for a candidate who has promised high ethics standards and ditched advisers who failed to meet them.

Weren't we having a discussin about ethics somewhere? (very big grin)

»

You are absolutely right!

You are absolutely right! In 1998 when I wrote the priorities it was China and Russia who we were planning on invading. Now in 2008 we are facing the entire Middle East who we have been told are terrorists without exception.

If they were we would not have survived their further attacks. We buy their oil and they would not want to lose our purchasing power. Same with China we buy their products and they are now making more money than ever before.

We need a balance in America where we can communicate with all nations and not in that arrogance that Bush struts when he looks into their eyes. He is naive, stupid and dangerous to America.

We must have security departments to work for the American People not some idiot who thinks he's God. We need a workable defense system that we do not have at this time.

We need fair trade agreements that do not require our armed services to protect. I hate to use the term "Fair and Balanced" but we need a President who respects both Parties or hopefully all three in the next election. We still have the power through our votes. The problem is getting the voters to know right from wrong.

»

You are correct, we need

You are correct, we need many things. First of all we need to be certain that John McCAin does not seize control of our country and make matters worse.

»

I will add that to my

I will add that to my Priority list! I am keeping notes on what the CHBers want. We must clean up the laws that keep us from going to war without proof of need. We have a lot to do.

I'm be visited tomorrow by a man from Phoenix who has a petition to get Libertarian candidates on the ballot for Arizona State Legislature positions and I will absolutely sign for the list he presents. You know, I believe politics start at a local level.

»

Politics should start at the

Politics should start at the local level....precinct captains to keep their eyes on the ACTUAL VOTE!

If we had more people involved at that level, it might be harder to cheat! (wink)

I mean come on! What's one night every couple of years to ensure that some dumb ass like GW doesn't take over our govt again.

Once we get rid of GW and his cronies and those in Congress who have enabled him, then we can proceed with rebuilding our infrastructure and our Republic.

»

Yes, I agree entirely,

Yes, I agree entirely, secure and defend the Constitution/bill of Rights and then move forward to secure our Diplomatic/Economic stature among nations.

I find it hard to blame any country which trusts us not and wants to stick it in our ear.

This cockamamie bunch in power have left a terrible stench and Leaders world wide are wary, rightfully so, of our intent and purpose.

When we have cleaned our own backyard and have shown trustworthiness to our own people maybe the playing field will level once more around the globe.

I abhor the idea of guilt by association, but this is where we have been led. This path of usurpation in the guise of democratization makes us look very, very bad.

It is to the point now that I feel the need to personally apologize to the rest of the world for being an American.

Fat lot of good it would do without real change coming from our governance and thats what really hurts.

The powers that be will not change unless we demand it and then stick to our principles.

It may sound like small potatoes Sandra but I feel a good starting point of organization would be a national strike, to include planes, trains, and autos.One week for starters then if need be, an amplified effort through community and Statewide participation.

Many I encounter through the course of the day agree it has to hurt both ways to be effective, but are willing to listen.

D.C. would most certainly hear us if We the People force them too.

Thanks for the place to ante up my 2 cents.

»

Bryan, you 2 cents are a

Bryan, you 2 cents are a valuable as gold

»

I don't know who to credit

I don't know who to credit with this so my apologies for not giving an author but it feels appropriate in these times.It's posted on my clubhouse wall.

Here I sit in all this rubble, I should have taken that job on the HUBBLE.

It's so very difficult to focus on the future when the past has left us wanting.

But as Roseannadanadan said,"It's always something". SNL.

I think we are strong enough to pull out of this tailspin by recognizing that being honest and forthright about the many blunders our policies have visited upon the world is the fist step, and to let the outsiders know of our resolve to never visit this type of insanity on mankind again will ever be the order of the day.

Just one little ride into space is all I ask.

»

Me too Bryan. I spend a lot

Me too Bryan. I spend a lot of time on the Science Channel and often wish I could leave this troubled earth and find total peace. I hope and believe you are right about our being able to pull out of the tailspin.

What worries me is the change in my attitudes. I have a poster who continues to follow me like a hungry puppy but she is not sweet and cute but filled with anger when I show up on several forums. We also have a very mysterious man who never gives much of his point of view but has caught my attention and apparently hers. I laid out a scenario about how handsome and sexy this man was and we haven't seen much of her as she is checking every search site on the internet. I have no idea what he looks like and am having a selfish chuckle over this deed.

Obama was just declared officially the Presumptive Democratic candidate and my Republican pals are shrugging it off as a fluke. I think he would make a grand President but I do not trust the GOP or Clinton to let it happen. It may be the first honest and decent thing we have seen in America since 2000 or before.

Contact Richard Branson of Virgin Space and if you have some money he might just take you along on his space ship. I'm too old but I am not too old to dream. I have my books of Carl Sagan and the Science Channel which is going Green I think tomorrow. Wonderous things for me to learn.

»

Capitol Hill Blue's columnists, blogs and reader comments

Capitol Hill Blue is an independent, non-partisan news site that belongs to no political party and subscribes to no political or philosophical point-of-view. Our columnists are welcome to their opinions but readers should understand that their views do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of this web site. We also welcome comments to selected opinion columns and in our popular ReaderRant discussion forum. Please remember, however, that we believe in civility on this web site and comments may be reviewed, moderated or removed if we feel they contain obscenities, racism, bigotry, anti-Semitic remarks or attack other posters. Our goal is reasoned discussion on issues facing this nation and we do not feel that goal is served by personal attacks and by seeing how many cute adjectives you can attach to an elected official or politician's name.

Copyright © 2008 Capitol Hill Blue

Sign up for Capitol Hill Blue's email newsletter
Get our headlines each morning.

Email:

User login