Home

Google

Web Capitol Hill Blue

 
May 15, 2008 - 6:19am.

Sen. Hillary Clinton (Reuters)

When Hillary Clinton claimed last week that Barack Obama was having trouble getting the votes of "hard working Americans, white Americans," much speculation ensued about whether she was intentionally exploiting classic racist beliefs about the supposed laziness of African Americans.

My view is that Clinton isn't as gifted a politician as her husband, so this apparent appeal to the kind of racist populism that fueled the careers of demagogues such as former Alabama Gov. George Wallace may have well been a verbal slip (if Bill had said something like that you can be sure it wouldn't have been by accident).

In the end it really doesn't matter much. A mistake people make about racism is to think it's primarily a personal flaw that some people have and others don't, as opposed to something that distorts our society at a structural level, whatever particular individuals may believe or say.

One of the easiest places to see this is in the sports world, where certain racial cliches and stereotypes get expressed in relatively unselfconscious ways. These stereotypes reflect the sort of language we are now seeing from Clinton and her advisers, about "blue-collar" voters.

Just as in Clinton's special political language, in the world of sports "blue-collar" is a code word for "white." A bunch of other terms -- "gritty," "gutty," "hard-nosed," "lunch-bucket ethic," and of course "intelligent" -- work in the same fashion.

The idea is that white players must overcome their lack of God-given athletic talent (which is apparently conceptualized as God's version of affirmative action for black players) through good moral character, and in particular the classic Puritan virtue of hard work.

In recent years, these cliches have been noted often enough that more sophisticated media figures have become aware of them, and will try to avoid them, just as savvy white politicians have come to realize it's not a good idea to refer to people like Barack Obama as "articulate."

Nevertheless these patterns of thinking are so ingrained that they continue to appear in amusing if ultimately disturbing ways. Consider this evaluation of a couple of football players just chosen in the NFL draft.

Draft Countdown, one of the most popular NFL draft evaluation sites on the Internet, provides critiques of college football players for the purpose of judging their professional prospects. The site lists what NFL talent scouts call a player's "measurables," the most important of which is his speed in an electronically timed 40-yard dash, and his weight (Generally speaking, the bigger and faster the player, the better the player's prospects, although "measurables" don't include "intangibles" like gritty, gutty, blue-collar leadership skills).

Here is the site's evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of two players. Each is listed by the site as running the 40 in 4.55 seconds. One weighs 212 pounds; the other weighs 211. Both play the same position (safety).

Player A's strengths include "excellent athleticism" and "great timed speed." His weaknesses include "technique and footwork" (i.e., things that can be improved through hard work and practice).

Player B's strengths include being "a hard worker and team leader with excellent intangibles." He is described as "smart" and "tough as nails." His weaknesses are said to be that he "is not a great athlete" and "does not have great timed speed."

Given the foregoing information, any sports fan with half a brain will be able to say with something close to absolute certainty that Player A (Kevin Phillips) is black, and Player B (Tom Zbikowski) is white.

From a social perspective, the evaluation of college football players may seem like a trivial thing. But the same cultural forces that almost automatically depict Tom Zbikowski as a gritty, gutty, hardworking, blue-collar team leader, and Kevin Phillips as a great natural athlete who could benefit from working a little harder, have far more important effects.

Just ask Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.

(Paul Campos is a law professor at the University of Colorado and can be reached at Paul.Campos(at)Colorado.edu.)

»

Anytime someone uses words

Anytime someone uses words that someone else doesn't like the word "rascist" comes up.

It is totally ridiculous. Are we going to have to listen to this junk for the rest of the year?

Perhaps we are long over due for this conversation.

Whatever happened to Freedom of Speech?

A black person can use the N word freely, but if I use the word niggardly to describe someone (it actually is a REAL WORD that has nothing to do with race -- look it up) I get a lecture from some ignorant person.

»

The point they make is

The point they make is valid, though. Did you compare the statistical attributes of those two players? Virtually identical! Yet, for the black player, his running speed was considered excellent while the SAME running speed for the white player was below par? I'm not saying it's deliberate, but it is obvious, nonetheless. We treat and assess people differently of different ethnicities and skin colors, even if not overtly. We shouldn't. There IS an underlying racism, something akin to institutional racism, that occurs. It is so ingrained that people don't even realize it's being done. Again - it doesn't mean they are deliberately slighting anyone in most cases, but there is sometimes a tendency to err in favor a minority group over a non-minority to avoid the appearance of racism. However, I think that doing that is itself a form of racism.

Racism is a vile and disgusting train of thought - it doesn't matter which side spews the venom. No one should look down on anyone else because of color or cultural background. But, the fact remains that certain subtle statements and comparisons do exist that raise the hairs on my back about the underlying meaning of what is said or intended. Some are more obvious - like the comparison of the two otherwise identical college players.

--------------------------------------------------
"Travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry, and narrow-mindedness." -Mark Twain

»

"Did you compare the

"Did you compare the statistical attributes of those two players?"

To say that because one small group of people behave in a similar manner is applicable to the same larger group, I believe is a proven statistical error. There are all kinds of reasons why that experiment gave the results it produced. What makes you assume that the assumption was made "to err in favor a minority group over a non-minority.."

Perhaps the coaches were primarily African American? Would it be rascist if they said the African American player was excellent and the caucasian player average? Perhaps in their opinion, their assessment is correct. Sometimes a coach sees natural born talent in a person that just isn't there with another even though statistically they may be at the same level at that particular time.

I understand the point you are making though. Be careful when you use the word WE, however. Because I treat someone by how they look, how they speak, HOW THEY ACT, their body language etc. I don't care what color they are?

I would also like to take this opportunity to point out that caucasians won't be the majority ethnicity in this country much longer. Hispanics will be which may be part of the antipathy against immigrants from Mexico.

»

What Senator Clinton is

What Senator Clinton is saying is not -- in itself -- racist. She isn't trying to make any connection between black people and laziness (nor did she say anything about food preferences which could also be interpreted as being racist). What she is saying is that racism is a factor which people take into account when making choices. And she is doing her level best to whip up that sentiment; she is giving legitimacy to those who use race as a deciding factor. This shouldn't surprise anyone since she has built much of her campaign on the notion that women should vote for her because she has two X chromosomes and no Y chromosome. It's acceptable to vote for her because she is a woman and it is also acceptable to not vote for Senator Obama because he is an African-American whose absent father was nominally Muslim. That's damaging to everyone -- especially Senator Clinton.

»

Huckabee quips about gun

Huckabee quips about gun aimed at Obama

Hearing a loud noise and interrupting his speech, Huckabee said: "That was Barack Obama. He just tripped off a chair. He's getting ready to speak and somebody aimed a gun at him and he — he dove for the floor."

Ok, so is Huckabee a rascist? And if so, what does that say about the Steal and Spend Republican Party since he was a major contender for their nomination?

I would think this would only encourage unwanted behavior. Is that what the Genuises of Propaganda have become? They can't beat Senator Obama so they encite violence against him by their supporters?

This from a former preacher who doesn't believe in Evolution or takes the Bible Literally.....his own words.

Just another typical example of the do as I say, not as I do, BIG BROTHER, Disinformational, steal and spend Republican Genuises of Propaganda.

If anything happens to Senator Obama, I think Huckabee should be indicted for inciting criminal behavoir. I thought that's how Terrorists behaved. Doesn't Osama Bin Laden incite others to commit violent acts?

»

Capitol Hill Blue's columnists, blogs and reader comments

Capitol Hill Blue is an independent, non-partisan news site that belongs to no political party and subscribes to no political or philosophical point-of-view. Our columnists and bloggers are welcome to their opinions but readers should understand that their views do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of this web site. We also welcome comments to our stories and columns and in our popular ReaderRant discussion forum. Please remember, however, that we believe in civility on this web site and comments may be reviewed, moderated or removed if we feel they contain obscenities, racism, bigotry, anti-Semitic remarks or attack other posters. Our goal is reasoned discussion on issues facing this nation and we do not feel that goal is served by personal attacks and by seeing how many cute adjectives you can attach to an elected official or politician's name.

Copyright © 2008 Capitol Hill Blue

Sign up for Capitol Hill Blue's email newsletter
Get our headlines each morning.

Email:

User login