Home

Google

Web Capitol Hill Blue

 
August 15, 2008 - 6:37am.

In 34 years, a generation from now, America truly will be a melting pot. The Census Bureau estimates that minorities, currently one third of the U.S. population, will constitute just over half of the population by 2042.

The children will get to that demographic landmark first. Today 44 percent of American children are minorities but by 2023 they will account for more than half, and over 60 percent by 2050.

The makeup of that group of children 42 years hence mirrors America's new mosaic: 39 percent Hispanic, 38 percent non-Hispanic white, 11 percent African American and Asians 6 percent.

The number of whites, now 66 percent of the population, will hold steady at 200 million, and as a group will be much older thanks to the aging of the baby boomers.

All of this is of intense interest to demographers, educators, political strategists and the several sides of the immigration debate. But even though whites have been the traditional majority -- 62 percent in 1790, according to the first census -- and the dominant culture, it is vital to remember, and vital to teach to that coming generation, that the United States was not founded on the basis of race, religion or ethnicity but on an ideal that we repeat every July 4th:

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness."

The Census says that there will be 439 million of us around to celebrate that ideal in 2050.

Technorati Tags:
»

Thank the Gods! I am tired

Thank the Gods! I am tired of all the white racists. I will be glad when they will all die out--every last one . My dad, a Native American, was forced to live outside of the city because his family was "half-breed" (in the year 1896). Still, to this day a Native American wouldn't make it running for President. Whites would vote for a half-dead senile old white man with half a brain, than vote for a Native born.

»

Avery Moore Some. Meaning

Avery Moore

Some. Meaning 'all'?

A stirring view above of hopeful progress towards a new dawn.

OK, enough. The first comment below the lead kicks you back to reality, and political reality really is quite unpleasant of late.

If the reaction to a recent Huffington Post item is any indication, the social schizophrenia and irrational scapegoating experienced by so many is spreading.

The story: A Christian arrived in China with 300 Bibles. All were confiscated by authorities.

So was there stateside outrage, rallies, marches on the Capitol that something as innocuous as a shipment of Bibles was deemed illegal?

Well, no. In fact many comments in Huffpo were extraordinarily hostile to the Christian. China had made the right decision. Proselytizing itself should be a criminal offense and as in China the religious should be jailed in perpetuity.

Such ideas resemble those made earlier by three groups.

In the lead up to Franco's dictatorship violently anti-religious partisans wanted to see priests and nuns lynched or shot by freedom-loving firing squads. That was one group.

Another was Beijing's unholy choir which denounced those foul-minded devil-worshipping, evil doers incarnated into sublimely pacifist Tibetan monks and nuns. Torture and kill them was the medicine prescribed. Them and Falun Gong - a dangerous exercise group.

The third was Stalin's anti-opposition choir which, on cue, denounced any formal social organization as a threat to domestic tranquility - off you go to the camps traitor!

Where were these comparisons being made?

In a representative democracy thought to be a beacon of religious tolerance, justice, and balanced cranial capacity.

Many comments assessed Religion's contribution to reality as owning principal responsibility for much of history's atrocities. Proof of this? Ignorance of any contrary theory.

If the Prince's bicycle collides with someone, it's the vehicle's fault, not the driver's.

It starts to become clear what the underlying issue may be - The religious community and minorities 'stole' the elections of 2000 and 2004 while the Left napped.

And Nader. Nader sabotaged the whole process by causing the loss of Florida. In good conscience and often trembling in isotopic rage zealous political fundamentalists demand that Badbad Ralph somehow be prevented from running again. If Ron Paul runs against McCain, and withers the right's vote, that's OK.

It's not surprising that people who write software often mistrust supermarket cash receipts. There are still spectacularly software-ignorant people in America. They simply do not understand how easily a computer can assign thousands of votes to communities where only hundreds of voters live.

But let no one dare talk about esoteric geek stuff like if-then-else branching and how to rig a nose-count so that a thumping loss becomes a win narrow enough to look plausible.

The inclusion of untenable candidates like Nader in a democratic process is just wrong wrong wrong in a representative democracy, based on free votes. Those credulous minorities and dim-bulb Christians deserve personal responsibility for a fixed horse race.

Sure.

What the religious did in plain sight was organize, identify themselves as an abused and ignored group, and seek political recognition by offering a trade off to pols - you do some stuff we like - we'll deliver a bloc of votes. We'll be back.

In short - they repeated exactly what trade unions did. Minorities have the same option, so does the left. The difference is that the left has chosen to scapegoat rather than expand their base by playing the same arduous and disciplined game. They are lazy.

For too many on the left somehow utopian belief in God's earthly paradise is more irrational and dangerous than belief in an oratorio-based political utopia guided by charismatic chronic liars and pickpockets.

»

Capitol Hill Blue's columnists, blogs and reader comments

Capitol Hill Blue is an independent, non-partisan news site that belongs to no political party and subscribes to no political or philosophical point-of-view. Our columnists are welcome to their opinions but readers should understand that their views do not necessarily reflect the editorial policies of this web site. We also welcome comments to selected opinion columns and in our popular ReaderRant discussion forum. Please remember, however, that we believe in civility on this web site and comments may be reviewed, moderated or removed if we feel they contain obscenities, racism, bigotry, anti-Semitic remarks or attack other posters. Our goal is reasoned discussion on issues facing this nation and we do not feel that goal is served by personal attacks and by seeing how many cute adjectives you can attach to an elected official or politician's name.

Copyright © 2008 Capitol Hill Blue

Sign up for Capitol Hill Blue's email newsletter
Get our headlines each morning.

Email:

User login